In application u/s 7 financial creditor and corporate debtor alone are necessary parties and no third party is contemplated
- Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
- < 1 minute
- By Chetan Kulasri
- |
- Last Updated on 10 September, 2021

Case details: Vekas Kumar Garg v. DMI Finance (P.) Ltd. - [2021] 129 taxmann.com 391 (NCLAT- New Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Acting Chairperson and Dr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Technical Member.
- Dhruv Gupta, Ms. Preeti Kashyap and Ankit Sharma, Advs. for the Appellant.
Facts of the Case
In this instant case, the CIRP under section 7 was started against the corporate debtor by Adjudicating Authority/NCLT. The Appellant/Resolution Professional of the corporate debtor filed an application for his impleadment as a necessary party.
NCLT Held
However, the NCLT rejected the appellant’s application on the ground that the appellant was not a necessary party to proceedings as financial creditor and corporate debtor alone were a necessary party and Adjudicating Authority was, at the pre-admission stage, only required to satisfy that there was a financial debt in respect whereof corporate debtor has committed a default warranting triggering of CIRP; no third party intervention was contemplated. Therefore, there was no legal infirmity in the impugned order passed by Adjudicating Authority
Case Review
-
- DMI Finance (P.) Ltd. v. Abloom Infotech (P.) Ltd. [2021] 129 taxmann.com 390 (NCLT – New Delhi) (para 5) affirmed
List of Cases Referred to
-
- Dr. Vishnu Kumar Agarwal v. Piramal Enterprises Ltd. [2019] 101 taxmann.com 464/151 SCL 555 (NCL – AT) (para 2).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

CA | CS | CMA