ICAI Issues Exposure Draft of SSA 5000 on Sustainability Assurance Engagements
- News|Blog|Account & Audit|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 23 May, 2026

1. Introduction
The development of a robust assurance framework assumes critical importance to ensure credibility, transparency, and comparability of sustainability disclosures. In line with these developments, the Sustainability Reporting Standards Board (SRSB) of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has issued an Exposure Draft on “Standard on Sustainability Assurance (SSA 5000), General Requirements for Sustainability Assurance Engagements. Public comments and suggestions on the Exposure Draft are invited by 19th June 2026.
The proposed SSA 5000 seeks to establish general principles and requirements applicable to sustainability assurance engagements and represents a significant step towards strengthening India’s sustainability assurance ecosystem.
2. Objective of SSA 5000
The proposed SSA 5000 addresses assurance engagements related to sustainability information. The Exposure Draft explains that sustainability information refers to information concerning sustainability matters, which may include diverse topics such as climate change, biodiversity, labour practices, environmental impact, social responsibility, governance-related matters, and associated risks and opportunities.
The Exposure Draft recognises that sustainability-related disclosures may cover different aspects of these topics, including metrics, targets, key performance indicators, and risk-related information. It further acknowledges that laws, regulations, and sustainability reporting frameworks may describe sustainability matters differently and may prescribe specific guidance for identifying and reporting sustainability information.
The proposed Standard also clarifies that sustainability information is prepared and reported in accordance with specified criteria. In this regard, SSA 5000 requires the assurance practitioner to evaluate whether the criteria expected to be applied in preparing sustainability information are suitable under the circumstances of the engagement.
The Exposure Draft further provides that criteria embodied in law or regulation or established by recognised organisations following transparent due process would ordinarily be presumed to be suitable criteria for the purpose of sustainability assurance engagements.
3. Entity’s Process for Identifying Sustainability Information
An important feature of the proposed SSA 5000 is its focus on the process adopted by entities for identifying sustainability matters to be reported. The Exposure Draft explains that criteria may specify a process through which the entity identifies sustainability matters, determines materiality, and establishes the reporting boundary for sustainability information.
In this context, the Standard refers to the “entity’s process to identify sustainability information to be reported” as the process followed by the entity to determine the sustainability matters that require reporting and the extent of reporting coverage.
This aspect assumes significance because sustainability reporting often involves management judgment, evolving reporting practices, and assessment of material sustainability-related risks and opportunities affecting the entity.
4. Scope of Sustainability Assurance Engagements
The proposed SSA 5000 also clarifies that the scope of a sustainability assurance engagement may either extend to the entire sustainability information reported by an entity or only a specific portion of such information.
Accordingly, the Standard requires the practitioner to clearly identify or describe the information that is subject to assurance. This requirement is particularly important in sustainability reporting engagements because entities may obtain assurance only on selected sustainability metrics, disclosures, or subject matters during the initial stages of sustainability reporting implementation.
The clarification regarding engagement scope is expected to improve transparency and avoid ambiguity for intended users of assurance reports.
Click Here To Read The Full Story
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA