IBBI Strengthens CIRP Rules on Creditor Participation and CoC Cost Approval
- Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 1 September, 2026

Notification F. No. IBBI/2026-27/GN/REG153 dated: 08.06.2026
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has introduced significant amendments to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) Regulations to improve transparency, accountability, and stakeholder participation in insolvency proceedings.
The amendments enhance the role of operational creditors, strengthen oversight of CIRP costs and introduce additional disclosure and reporting requirements for the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and Resolution Professionals (RPs).
1. Greater Representation for Operational Creditors
The amended regulations provide for the constitution of a committee representing operational creditors.
The committee shall comprise:
- The 18 largest unrelated operational creditors, or
- All operational creditors with fewer than 18.
This measure seeks to improve operational creditors’ participation in the resolution process.
2. Observer Status for Operational Creditors in CoC Meetings
Where creditors other than scheduled banks or public financial institutions hold more than 66% voting share in the Committee of Creditors, certain operational creditors may attend CoC meetings as observers.
The observer category shall include:
- The five largest unrelated operational creditors, and
- Key statutory authorities, where applicable.
Such participants may attend meetings but will not possess voting rights.
3. Prior CoC Approval Mandatory for CIRP Costs
To strengthen financial discipline, the amendments require the Resolution Professional (RP) to obtain prior approval of the Committee of Creditors for:
- Insolvency Resolution Process Costs incurred after the first CoC meeting.
The requirement is intended to improve oversight and accountability regarding CIRP expenditure.
4. Going Concern Assessment Report Introduced
The amendments require the Resolution Professional to prepare a:
Going Concern Assessment Report
The report is expected to assess the corporate debtor’s ability to continue operations and assist stakeholders in evaluating resolution prospects.
5. Enhanced Disclosure by Committee of Creditors
The Committee of Creditors is now required to record the rationale underlying its decisions regarding resolution plans.
The CoC must specifically document its assessment of:
5.1. Feasibility and Viability of Resolution Plans
The reasons supporting its conclusion regarding the feasibility and viability of the selected resolution plan.
5.2. Expected Value Realisation
The expected value realisation for creditors under the approved resolution plan.
5.3. Market Discovery Measures
The adequacy of market discovery efforts undertaken during the resolution process, including steps taken to maximise participation and value.
6. Objective of the Amendments
The amendments seek to strengthen governance and decision-making within the insolvency framework by:
- Enhancing participation of operational creditors;
- Improving transparency in CoC deliberations;
- Strengthening control over CIRP costs;
- Increasing accountability of Resolution Professionals; and
- Promoting informed and well-documented resolution outcomes.
The revised framework is expected to improve stakeholder confidence and contribute to more transparent and efficient insolvency resolution proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Click Here To Read The Full Notification
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA