HC Set Aside Order Rejecting ITC Claim of Assessee Where Supplier Wrongly Mentioned GSTIN of Sister Concern

  • Blog|News|GST & Customs|
  • < 1 minute
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 9 April, 2024

GSTIN

Case Details: Tvl. Hansraj and Company v. Assistant Commissioner (ST) - [2024] 160 taxmann.com 555 (Madras)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J
  • K.M. Malarmannan, for the Petitioner. 
  • T.N.C. Kaushik, AGP (T) for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner received a notice alleging that it had made an excess claim of ITC and this was evident on comparing GSTR-3B return with GSTR-2A return. It submitted that the relevant invoice was issued by the petitioner’s supplier but it had wrongly indicated the GSTIN of the sister concern of the petitioner. However, the reply was disregarded and the proposal to impose tax, interest and penalty was confirmed. Therefore, it filed writ petition against the order.

High Court Held

The Honorable High Court noted that the documents on record, such as invoice and the GSTR-1 return of supplier, prima facie indicate that the GSTIN of sister concern of petitioner was wrongly mentioned by supplier in the returns and thus, in such scenario, the petitioner would have been unjustly deprived of ITC.

Therefore, the Court held that the impugned order was to be quashed and matter was to be remanded to Assessing Officer to provide petitioner with an opportunity to redress grievance.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied