HC Remitted Matter Back Since Commissioner (A) Erroneously hadn’t Considered Application Seeking Condonation of Delay
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 29 March, 2024

Case Detail: White Mountain Trading (P.) Ltd. v. Additional Commissioner, CGST Appeals-II - [2024] 160 taxmann.com 382 (Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Sanjeev Sachdeva & Ravinder Dudeja, JJ.
- Srijan Sinha & Naveen Soni, Advs. for the Petitioner.
- Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel & Jatin Kumar Gaur, Adv. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the present case, the petitioner filed appeal against the order but the same was rejected on the ground that appeal was filed after a delay of more than one month. It filed writ petition and contended that it had filed appeal through online process within time but the appeal was rejected by considering date of filing physical copy as filing date.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that as per the impugned order, the appeal was actually filed on 25.09.2023 after a delay of more than one month. However, the petitioner had filed the appeal through an online process on 02.09.2023 and date of filing would be taken as date of initial filing through online mode since date of filing would always be taken as the date of initial filing through the online mode if other steps as required in the law were also taken by the assessee.
Therefore, the Court held that the Commissioner (Appeals) had erroneously not considered application seeking condonation of delay and the order rejecting appeal was liable to be set aside. The Court also remitted matter to consider application seeking condonation of delay.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA