HC Placed Matter Before Division Bench to Decide Whether State Tax Authority Can Issue SCN Under CGST Act
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 17 December, 2024
Case Details: Pinnacle Vehicles and Services (P.) Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner, (Intelligence and Enforcement) - [2024] 169 taxmann.com 177 (Kerala)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Gopinath P., J.
-
Ammu Charles, Adv. for the Petitioner.
-
J. Vishnu, Adv. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was a registered person under the CGST/SGST Acts, allocated to the jurisdiction of the Central Tax Authorities. The petitioner challenged the show cause notice issued by the State Tax Authority without jurisdiction and without any notification as contemplated by the provisions of Section 6(1) of the CGST Act.
High Court Held
The Kerala High Court noted that a reading of Section 6(1) of the CGST Act makes it clear that the officers appointed under the State Goods and Services Tax Act are authorised to be proper officers for the purposes of the Act, subject to such conditions as the Government shall, on the recommendations of the Council, by notification, specify. Unaided by authority, a reading of the provision suggests that the officers appointed under the State Goods and Services Tax Act are proper officers for the purposes of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act. It is only when any restriction or condition has to be placed on the exercise of power by any officer appointed under the State Goods and Services Tax Act that a notification as contemplated by the provisions of Section 6(1) of the CGST Act has to be issued.
Since the issue raised in this writ petition will affect several proceedings, and taking note of the view expressed by the Madras High Court in case of Tvl. Vardhan Infrastructure [2024] 145 taxmann.com 1/66 GST 1 (Mad.), which is contrary to the prima facie view that the Court has taken, the Court was of the opinion that this issue requires an authoritative pronouncement by a Division Bench of this Court.
List of Cases Reviewed
- Tvl. Vardhan Infrastructure v. Special Secretary, Head of GST Council Secretariat [2024] 145 taxmann.com 1/66 GST 1 (Mad.) (para 4) distinguished.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied