HC levied penalty on officer demanding unnecessary documents for grant of GST registration

  • Blog|GST & Customs|News|
  • |
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 11 April, 2022

GST registration

Case details: Ranjana Singh v. Commissioner of State Tax - [2022] 136 taxmann.com 391 (Allahabad)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Piyush Agrawal, J. 
    • Aloke Kumar for the Petitioner.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner filed application for new registration. On submission of the application, an inspection was made at the business premises of the petitioner. Thereafter, notice was issued for providing electricity bill or house tax bill or any other document related to the business and reply was submitted along with relevant documents. However, the registration application was rejected for non-submission of electricity bill though PAN and Aadhaar details as well as property tax receipts were provided by petitioner. It filed appeal but the appellate authority too has rejected the appeal confirming the order of rejection. It filed writ against the rejection of registration application and appeal.

High Court Held

The Honorable High Court observed that PAN and Aadhaar details as well as property receipts were provided as per the provisions of the CGST Act and rules. But the authorities without whispering any word or assigning any reason had rejected the application for non-specifying possession of the business premises and insisted for submission of electricity bill. The authorities below have further erred in law in not pointing out any defect in submission of house tax receipt and insisted for submission of electricity bill whereas the notice gave an option for submission of recent electricity bill or house tax receipt. It was held that the petitioner had every right to carry on business lawfully when shortcomings or defects were not pointed out in reply submitted along with documents. The impugned order was quashed and since the authorities had acted only to harass petitioner; therefore, costs of Rs. 15,000 was imposed which may be recovered from erring officer.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied