HC Dismissed Petition Challenging Assessment Order Since Assessee Had Sufficient Opportunities During Assessment Process

  • Blog|News|GST & Customs|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 21 February, 2024

Petition

Case Details: Tvl. Sakthi Ganesh Textiles (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner (State Tax) - [2024] 159 taxmann.com 486 (Madras)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J.
  • G. Derrick Sam for the Petitioner
  • C. Harsha Raj for the Respondent

Facts of the Case

In the present case, the assessee faced assessment orders regarding tax liabilities for various periods. It challenged these orders through writ petitions, claiming violation of natural justice principles during assessment process. The Court quashed initial orders and remanded matter for Revenue Authority to issue proper speaking orders after considering petitioner’s response to show cause notices.

Thereafter, the department issued impugned orders following High Court’s directions but assessee again challenged impugned assessment orders issued by contending denial of right to cross-examine parties involved in reports and statements used by Revenue Authority, lack of access to all relevant documents, and incorrect finding regarding their eligibility for transitional credit despite submitting necessary documents.

High Court Held

The Honorable High Court noted that the assessee had been given adequate opportunities to be heard and submit documents during assessment process. However, the assessee was not entitled to cross-examine parties who authored reports or provided statements relied upon by Revenue, as these were not inquiry proceedings pursuant to a charge memo. Thus, the High Court held that there were no grounds for interference and granted option to assessee to appeal through statutory channels.

List of Cases Reviewed

  • Thilagarathinam Match Works v. Commissioner of C.Ex., Tirunelveli (Thilagarathinam Match Works), 2013 (295) E.L.T. 195(Mad) (para 8) distinguished

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied