Foreign Exchange Differences on Payables for Inventory & PPE | Ind AS Guide

Introduction: The Accounting Challenge

This document explores a key accounting issue: the treatment of unrealised foreign exchange differences that arise on foreign currency payables related to the acquisition of inventory and property, plant and equipment (PPE). The fundamental question is whether these unrealised exchange differences can be capitalised as part of the asset’s cost or must be recognised separately in the profit and loss statement. This issue is particularly relevant under Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) and requires a clear understanding of how different types of assets and liabilities are classified and treated in financial statements.

Understanding the Classification Under Ind AS

A central aspect of this analysis is the distinction between monetary and non-monetary items. Under Ind AS, both inventory and PPE are classified as non-monetary assets, which are measured at historical cost in the entity’s functional currency. In contrast, foreign currency payables are considered monetary items, meaning they are subject to re-translation at each reporting date using the closing exchange rate. This classification leads to unrealised exchange differences that arise due to the fluctuation in exchange rates between the transaction date and the reporting date. Understanding this divergence is critical for applying the correct accounting treatment.

Relevant Ind AS Standards and Their Application

The treatment of these exchange differences is governed by three main standards: Ind AS 2 (Inventories), Ind AS 16 (Property, Plant and Equipment), and Ind AS 21 (The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates). Ind AS 2 and Ind AS 16 allow for the inclusion of directly attributable costs in the cost of inventory and PPE, respectively. However, Ind AS 21 specifically addresses how foreign exchange differences should be accounted for. As per Ind AS 21, unrealised exchange differences on monetary items are generally recognised in the profit or loss, unless they meet the conditions for capitalisation under other specific provisions.

Capitalisation vs. Separate Recognition

In summary, whether the unrealised exchange difference can be added to the asset’s cost hinges on the timing and nature of the liability. If the exchange difference arises before the asset is ready for use or sale, and it is considered directly attributable to bringing the asset to its intended condition, capitalisation may be justified under Ind AS 2 or 16. However, post-acquisition or post-readiness differences must be recognised separately in the income statement as per Ind AS 21. This document highlights the importance of careful assessment in practice, as misclassification or misapplication could lead to material misstatements in the financial results and asset valuations.

Click Here To Read The Full Story