Executive directors replaceable with independent directors if conditions u/s 100 are met: HC

  • News|Blog|Company Law|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 18 April, 2022

Extra-Ordinary General Meeting;

Case Details: Invesco Developing Markets Fund v. Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. - [2022] 137 taxmann.com 216 (Bombay)[22-03-2022]

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • S.J. Kathawalla and Milind N. Jadhav, JJ.
    • Janak DwarkadasRavi KadamSharan Jagtiani, Sr. Advs. Somasekhar SundaresanCyrus ArdeshirGaurav MehtaMs. Rishika HarishBhavik MehtaKingshuk BanerjeeTomu FrancisMs. Praktruti JoshiZacarias JosephRitvik Kulkarni and Ms. Tikshata Modi for the Appellant.
    • Aspi ChinoyNavroz SeervaiPesi ModiBirendra SarafZal Andhyarujina, Sr. Advs. Prateek SakseriaNitesh JainAtul JainAdrish GuhaMs. Vatsala KumarMs. Ritika AjitsariaBrihad RalhanSuhail NathaniMs. Mumtaz BhallaManendra SinghChanakya KeswaniNeeraj MalikNausher Kohli and Ms. Maithili Parikh for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, appellants filed an appeal against the impugned order of the Civil Judge restraining the shareholders of the Company from calling for and holding an Extra Ordinary General Meeting as requisitioned by them.

The appellants issued a Requisition (“Requisition”) to Zee in terms of Section 100(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 calling for an Extra-Ordinary General Meeting. By this Requisition, the Appellants requisitioned the convening of an Extraordinary General Meeting to inter-alia remove 3 non-independent directors of the Company. The Requisition further sought the appointment of 6 Independent Directors on the Board of Zee “subject to the approval of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting”.

The appeal lied on two grounds:

a) Whether the Civil Court can injunct the calling of a requisitioned EGM or not?

b) Whether the shareholders can pass the resolution to replace all executive directors with independent directors?

It was submitted that Appellants had already filed an application under Section 98 i.e., the NCLT Petition, it was only the NCLT that was empowered to decide whether or not to call, hold or conduct a meeting.

High Court Held

The Bombay High Court held that it cannot interfere with the statutory right of a shareholder to call for an EGM. It was also submitted that the jurisdiction of a Civil Court to entertain a challenge to the Requisition issued under Section 100 of the Act as being invalid/illegal/contrary to the law was not affected by the bar contained in Section 430 of the Act.

In terms of Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013, Civil Court cannot injunct the calling of a requisitioned EGM if the shareholder’s requisition meets numerical &procedural requirements of section 100 of the Companies Act,2013. The company is obliged to act on the shareholder’s requisition u/s 100 if it meets the numerical and procedural requirements.

Moreover, a shareholder can propose that all executive directors be replaced with independent directors. Neither section 149 of the Companies Act,2013 nor Regulation 17 of SEBI LODR bar the company from having only independent directors on its board of directors. The limit is only placed by statute with reference to the proportion of Executive Directors on the Board. There is no limit placed on the number/proportion of Non-Executive and Independent Directors.

For all of the reasons aforesaid, the court concluded that the proposed resolutions contained in the Requisition are neither illegal nor incapable of being lawfully implemented and consequently, set aside all of the findings in this regard.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied