Ex-gratia payment received by ‘Sunil Joshi’ isn’t taxable if BCCI holding sec. 12AA registration: ITAT
- Blog|Income Tax|News|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- Last Updated on 5 May, 2022
Case Details: Sunil Bandacharya Joshi v. DCIT -  137 taxmann.com 343 (Bangalore - Trib.)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Chandra Poojari, Accountant Member and George George K, Judicial Member
- Smt. Preethi Patel, Adv. for the Appellant.
- Ananda H., Addl.CIT-DR for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
Assessee was a retired professional cricketer who received ex-gratia payment as a one-time benefit from BCCI. He claimed such amount as capital receipt not liable to be taxed.
During the assessment, AO held that said sum would be taxable under section 56(2)(vii) on the ground that BCCI did not have registration under section 12AA. Accordingly, he made additions to the income of the assessee. On appeal, the Commissioner (Appeal) upheld said addition and further held that said sum was liable to be taxed under section 28(iv). Aggrieved-assessee filed the instant appeal before the Tribunal.
The Tribunal held that the assessee was paid ex-gratia amount for having played cricket for the country. Since the assessee was a retired cricketer and not rendering any services to BCCI, section 28(iv) would not be applicable.
Further, the sole reason for bringing to tax such a sum was that BCCI was not having registration under section 12AA. However, the assessee contended that registration of BCCI under section 12AA was restored by the Mumbai Bench of Tribunal for the relevant assessment year.
Therefore, in the interest of justice and equity, the case needs to be considered afresh by the AO. Accordingly, AO was directed to examine whether BCCI was having registration under section 12AA for the relevant assessment year and if the satisfied said amount would not be taxable under section 56(2)(vii).
List of Cases Referred to
- BCCI v. Pr. CIT  132 taxmann.com 132/ 192 ITD 230 (Mum. – Trib.) (para 5)
- CIT v. Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd.  93 taxmann.com 32/255 Taxman 305/404 ITR 1 (SC) (para 5)
- ITO v. Peetadhipathi Trust [IT Appeal Nos. 1382 & 1535 (Bang.) of 2010, dated 3-1-2012] (para 5).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied