Error of Sending Demand Notice along with Draft Assessment Order couldn’t be Cured u/s 292B: HC
- Blog|News|Transfer Pricing|
- 3 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- Last Updated on 16 May, 2023
Case Details: CIT (International Taxation) v. Cisco Systems Services B.V. -  149 taxmann.com 486 (Karnataka)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- P.S. Dinesh Kumar & Ramachandra D. Huddar, JJ.
- K.V. Aravind, Sr. Standing Counsel for the Appellant.
- Nageshwar Rao, Adv. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
Assessee-Company was incorporated and registered in Amsterdam. It had its branch office in India and provided technical advanced professional engineering and consultancy services. For the relevant assessment years, the assessee received a notice of demand under section 156 along with a draft assessment order under section 143(3) passed by the Assistant Commissioner.
Subsequently, the case was taken up for reassessment based on the information collected during the survey and Assessing Officer (AO) passed the final assessment order under section 147 read with section 144C by making certain addition.
High Court Held
On appeal, the Tribunal deleted the additions, and the matter reached Karnataka High Court.
The Court held that assessment is one integrated process involving the assessment of total income and the determination of the tax. In this case, at the stage of passing the draft order, the Assistant Commissioner had assessed the tax, passed a final order, and issued a demand notice.
Section 144C lays down a detailed procedure. Under section 144C(1), the AO is required to forward a draft of the proposed order of assessment to the assessee. Assessee may file its acceptance or objection before the DRP and the AO. The AO shall complete the assessment if the assessee confirms its acceptance or no objections are received within 30 days.
Where the DRP receives any objection from the assessee, it shall issue necessary directions to the Assessing Officer to enable him to complete the assessment after considering the documents/material mentioned in section 144C(6)(a) to (g), which includes the draft order. Before issuing the directions, the DRP may also make such further enquiry by any Income-tax Authority.
Further, upon receipt of the directions from DRP under section 144C(5), the AO shall complete the assessment within the prescribed time limit.
After that, a notice of demand under section 156 may be issued after completion of the assessment under section 144C(13).
It is settled that the demand notice stems from an order of assessment and is enforceable, and it meets the assessee with civil consequences. The argument raised by the AO that the demand notice was not enforced was fallacious and noted only to be rejected. Further, the argument that any mistake or defect shall not invalidate the draft assessment order as per Section 292B and it was a curable defect also rejected.
List of Cases Reviewed
- Vijay Television (P.) Ltd. v. DRP  46 taxmann.com 100/225 Taxman 35/369 ITR 113 (Mad.) (para 17)
- Kalyan Kumar Ray v. CIT  191 ITR 634 SC (para 20) followed.
- Cisco Systems Services B.V. v. Dy. CIT (IT)  136 taxmann.com 354/194 ITD 135 (Bang. – Trib.)
- Cisco Systems Services B.V. v. Dy. CIT [IT (IT) Appeal No. 961 of 2017, dated 19-1-2022]
- Cisco Systems Services B.V. v. Dy. CIT (IT)  136 taxmann.com 118/193 ITD 809 (Bang. – Trib.) (para 23) affirmed.
List of Cases Referred to
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied