Dispute relating to non-receipt of monthly rent is contractual in nature, outside purview of Competition Act: CCI
- Blog|News|Competition Law|
- < 1 minute
- By Chetan Kulasri
- |
- Last Updated on 25 February, 2026

Case Details: Kuldeep Dahiya v. Nishad N.P. - [2021] 132 taxmann.com 93 (CCI)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Ashok Kumar Gupta, Chairperson
- Ms. Sangeeta Verma and Bhagwant Singh Bishnoi, Member
Facts of the Case
In the given case, the informant had made an investment in a hospitality project of OP namely, ‘Way One Resort LLP’, and OP agreed to pay a monthly rent of Rs.14 thousand and approx. 1 percent of built-up area in a said project to informant.
CCI Held
The Information was filed by the informant alleging violation of sections 3 and 4 on the ground that neither he received monthly return nor refund of money. However, the issue projected by an informant in instant information did not reveal any competition issue and same appeared to be purely individual consumer/contractual in nature, and as such remedies lie elsewhere. Thus, the matter was to be closed in terms of provisions contained in section 26(2).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

CA | CS | CMA