Department is Directed to Process Second Refund Application as Rejection Would Amount to Unjust Enrichment From Excess Tax Collected | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 7 April, 2025
Case Details: ABN Industries vs. Union of India - [2025] 172 taxmann.com 822 (Gujarat)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Bhargav D. Karia & D.N. Ray, JJ.
-
Hardik V Vora for the Petitioner.
-
Ms Hetvi H Sancheti for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner supplied goods to Special Economic Zone (SEZ) Units without paying taxes. It filed refund application and the refund of ITC was approved. However, it made an error in claiming ITC as certain purchase bills were unintentionally omitted during refund calculation. Therefore, it submitted another refund application and a show cause notice was issued proposing to reject refund application. It submitted reply but refund claim was rejected in view of Circular No. 125/44/2019-GST dated 18-11-2019. It filed appeal but the same was rejected. It filed writ petition against the rejection of refund claim.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the department rejected refund claim on the ground that it was not permissible under Circular No. 125/44/2019-GST dated 18-11-2019. However, the Court noted that once the quantum of refund was admitted by department, failure to do so would tantamount to unjust enrichment on part of department to excess tax collected from assessee, which it did not have authority. Therefore, the Court held that the department was to be directed to process refund application of assessee.
List of Cases Referred to
- Shree Renuka Sugars Ltd. v. State of Gujarat [2023] 152 taxmann.com 550/100 GST 159/78 GSTL 324 (Gujarat) (para 8).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied