Demanding Bank Guarantee From Assessee to Grant GST Refund is Contrary to Law | HC
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 13 January, 2024
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: Raj Kamal Cargo Movers v. Assistant Commissioner, Jaipur - [2024] 158 taxmann.com 252 (Rajasthan)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Arun Bhansali & Ashutosh Kumar, JJ.
- Vikram Kumar Gogra for the Petitioner.
- Ayush Singh, Ajay Singh & Punit Singhvi for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the present case, the petitioner filed a writ petition to challenge the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner demanding bank guarantee from the petitioner before allowing refund. It was submitted that the Assistant Commissioner passed original order and the same was set aside by the Appellate Authority and directed to provide solvent security. However, the Assistant Commissioner again demanded bank guarantee from the petitioner.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the Assistant Commissioner, who had passed original order and ordered for refund, had been trying to somehow block the refund to be made to the petitioner. The Court further noted that once solvent security was provided by the petitioner, the Assistant Commissioner again, apparently not willing to refund the amount, had demanded bank guarantee from the petitioner.
The Court also noted that the indication made that the bank guarantee needs to be taken from the petitioner by way of solvent security by itself is contradictory inasmuch as the term ‘solvent security’ essentially means that the person who is providing the security should not have been declared bankrupt by the court and he has to produce documents to indicate that he owns some movable/immovable property, which is equivalent to the amount for which the said security is being provided.
However, the ‘bank guarantee’ is a guarantee given by the bank on behalf of the applicant to cover the payment obligation to a third party. Therefore, the Court held that the action of seeking bank guarantee from the petitioner was ex facie contrary to the directions of Appellate Authority and the same was liable to be set aside.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
