Delhi HC refers matter to larger bench to decide writ jurisdiction in faceless assessment if AO located outside Delhi

  • Blog|News|Income Tax|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 28 November, 2022

faceless assessment

Case Details: GPL-RKTCPL JV v. National Faceless Assessment Centre - [2022] 145 156 (Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Manmohan & Ms Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, JJ.
    • Rohit JainAniket D. Agrawal, Advs. for the Appellant.
    • Puneet Rai, Senior Standing Counsel & Adeeba Mujahid, Standing Counsels for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

Assessee-petitioner (jurisdiction at Chattisgarh) filed its return of income for the relevant assessment year. During the assessment, a show cause notice-cum-assessment order was served to which the assessee could not respond because of certain reasons. Without giving a proper opportunity of being heard to the assessee, the final assessment order was passed.

Assessee filed writ petition before the Delhi High Court by contending that the Assessing Officer (AO) violated the principles of natural justice while passing the assessment order.

However, the AO raised the question of the admissibility of the petition. It was contended that the petition filed by the assessee wasn’t maintainable as the situs of the jurisdictional AO was outside India.

High Court Held

The Delhi High Court held the issue of maintainability of a writ petition in faceless assessments where the jurisdiction of AO is situated outside the jurisdiction of the High Court will arise in repeatedly in many cases.

Thus to have a conclusive view on this, the matter is referred to a larger bench for a conclusive view. The High Court frames the following questions of law:

a) Whether the Delhi High Court has the necessary territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ petitions if the jurisdictional Assessing officer is located outside Delhi?

b) Whether the Delhi High Court should entertain the writ petitions or refuse to exercise discretion to entertain the same on the ground that Jurisdictional Assessing Officer is located outside the jurisdiction of Delhi Court?

c) Whether the presence of the National Faceless Assessment Centre in Delhi would be a sufficient ‘cause of action’ to confer jurisdiction on Delhi Court to entertain a writ petition?

d) Whether the petitioner has the right to choose the High Court if a part of the cause of action arises within one or more High Courts?

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied