Delay in Filing Appeal Condoned Due to Non-Formation of GSTAT Obstructing Assessee’s Right to Appeal
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 28 December, 2024
Case Details: Pramod Kumar Jaiswal v. State of West Bengal - [2024] 169 taxmann.com 488 (Calcutta)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.
-
Anil Kumar Dugar, Rajarshi Chatterjee, Somnath Balial, Govind Jethalia & Mrs Suman Sahani for the Petitioner.
-
A. Ram, Md. T.M. Siddiqui, T. Chakraborty, S. Sanyal & S. Shaw for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner received a GST demand order under Section 73(9) of the CGST Act, 2017. Although the petitioner initially engaged an advocate to file an appeal within the prescribed time, the advocate failed to do so. A second advocate subsequently filed the appeal, but it was rejected on the grounds of limitation. Ih filed writ petition against order passed by the Appellate Authority for condonation of delay.
High Court Held
The High Court noted that the delay in filing the appeal was due to extenuating circumstances beyond the petitioner’s control and not due to deliberate inaction. It held that dismissing the appeal solely on the basis of delay, without considering its merits or procedural constraints, was legally untenable. Furthermore, the lack of access to the GST Appellate Tribunal, which was yet to be constituted, deprived the petitioner of a statutory right to a higher appeal.
Therefore, the Court quashed the order rejecting the appeal and directed the Appellate Authority to reconsider the application for condonation of delay on its merits and proceed to hear the appeal.
List of Cases Referred to
- Ram Krishna Mission Ashrama v. State of Bihar [2023] 154 taxmann.com 495/[2024] 101 GST 501/80 GSTL 173 (Patna) (para 9).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied