Date of Fresh Refund Application After Rectifying Deficiencies Can’t Be Considered for Purposes of Determining Period of Limitation | HC

  • Blog|News|GST & Customs|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 29 November, 2024

GST refund application

Case Details: Sali P. Mathai v. State Tax Officer - [2024] 168 taxmann.com 538 (Kerala)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Gopinath P., J.
  • Meera V. Menon & R. Sreejith, Advs. for the Petitioner.
  • Jasmin M.M., Adv. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the petitioner filed an application for a refund on 05.04.2021 seeking a refund of an amount of Rs. 17,46,210/-. In response to that application, the petitioner was served with communication dated 19.04.2021, informing the petitioner regarding certain deficiencies in the application for a refund. The petitioner thereafter filed a fresh application for a refund on 30.09.2021.

The fresh application was admittedly beyond the time specified in Section 54 of the CGST/SGST Acts and was therefore rejected. The petitioner contended that the rejection of the application filed by the petitioner on 30.09.2021 as being time-barred with reference to the provisions contained in Section 54 of the CGST/SGST Acts cannot be sustained in law. It was submitted that Section 54 of the CGST/SGST Acts does not contemplate the filing of a second application. Further, it was submitted that the requirement in Rule 90(3) of the CGST Rules to file a fresh application for a refund on deficiencies being intimated is not in tune with the statutory provisions.

High Court Held

The High Court observed that Rule 90(3) of the CGST Rules requires the filing of a fresh refund application after rectification of deficiencies pointed out in respect of the first application. However, the said sub-rule does not contemplate that the date of the fresh application has to be considered for the purposes of determining the period of limitation for filing an application for refund under Section 54(1) of the CGST/SGST Acts. The High Court held that the rejection of the application for refund filed by the petitioner on the ground that the second application filed by the petitioner was beyond the time specified in Section 54(1) of the CGST/SGST Acts cannot be sustained in law. Accordingly, the writ petition was allowed.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied