CS being KMP can represent company before authorities & file a petition: NCLT

  • Blog|News|Company Law|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 17 December, 2022

Company Secretary

Case Details: Mayank Agarwal v. Technology Frontiers (India) (P.) Ltd. - [2022] 145 taxmann.com 305 (NCLT- Chennai)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • S. Ramathilagam, Judicial Member & Anil Kumar B., Technical Member
    • P.H. Aravindh Pandian, Sr. Adv. & Edward James, Adv. for the Applicant.
    • S. Sriram, PCS for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The Company Secretary of the respondent company had filed a petition to ensure compliance with mandatory requirements under section 90. The applicant-director of the company, filed an interlocutory application, alleging that the company alone was empowered to apply under section 90(7).

It was also alleged that the Company Secretary had not taken any approval from the Board of Directors to file a said petition.

NCLT Held

The NCLT stated that the company is an artificial person and functions on basis of the Board of Directors and key managerial personnel and since the Company Secretary is a key managerial person under section 2(51), the officer in default as per section 2(60) and as per power given under section 205(1)(c) read with clause 4 of rule 10 of Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014, Company Secretary can represent the company before various regulators and other authorities in connection with discharge of various duties under Act.

Further, the Company Secretary is Watchdog of protecting Principles of Corporate Governance as well as collective interest of all stakeholders so also company.

The NCLT held that the Company Secretary had locus standi to file such a petition. The Company Secretary had acted diligently and promptly by filing a petition to ensure compliance of mandatory provisions under section 90 and, therefore, an instant interlocutory application was to be dismissed.

List of Cases Referred to

    • Nibro Ltd. v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. [1991] 70 Comp. Case 388 (Delhi) (para 9)
    • State Bank of Travancore v. Kingston Computers (I) (P.) Ltd. [2011] 11 taxmann.com 172/102 CLA 124/107 SCL 377/2 Comp. LJ 473/163 Comp. Case 37/[2011] 11 SCC 524 (SC) (para 9)
    • United Bank of India v. Naresh Kumar [OA No. 463 of 2014, dated 23-10-2015] (para 13).

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied