Cryptic and non-speaking order passed without considering annexure filed by petitioner to be set aside: HC

  • News|Blog|GST & Customs|
  • < 1 minute
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 9 November, 2022

Non-speaking order

Case Details: Jothi Agency v. State Tax Commissioner (GST) - [2022] 144 taxmann.com 103 (Madras)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • M.Nirmal Kumar, J.
    • K. Vadivelu for the Petitioner.
    • P. Subbaraj for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner was purchasing edible oil from wholesale dealers and doing retail business. It received notice stating that on scrutiny of Form GSTR-1 v. GSTR-3B, differences were found. The petitioner filed his objections and enclosed the difference between the purchase and sale details. However, order was passed wherein these factors were not considered and further, no personal hearing was given to the petitioner. It filed writ petition against the same.

High Court Held

The Honorable High Court observed that the petitioner in his reply filed an annexure showing the difference of calculation. But, in the impugned order, there was no reason given for why the petitioner’s calculation was not considered. Moreover, the department questioned classification, which needed personal hearing and perusal of documents and thereafter, detailed order was to be passed. Thus, it was held that the impugned order being cryptic and non-speaking was to be set aside and matter was remanded for reconsideration after affording opportunity of personal hearing to petitioner.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied