Credit found in bank a/c belongs to assessee if it was used by him for his investment: HC

  • Blog|News|Income Tax|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 27 May, 2022

HC justified section 68 additions

Case Details: Pulin Ku. Bir v. DCIT - [2022] 138 taxmann.com 228 (Orissa)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Dr S. Muralidhar, CJ.
    • B. Panda, Sr. Adv. for the Appellant.
    • R.S. Chimanka, Sr. Standing Counsel for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

During the assessment, the Assessing Officer (AO) found that there was an unexplained cash deposit in the sum of Rs. 41 lakh in the assessee’s bank account. The assessee explained that the sum had been received from his married daughter residing in the USA for the purchase by him of a house in Bhubaneswar.

In support of his contention, the assessee also produced a declaration from his daughter certifying that the sum was paid for constructing/purchasing land and building. However, AO was not satisfied with the explanation and added said sum to the taxable income of the assessee.

CIT(A) and ITAT agreed with the conclusion reached by the AO. Aggrieved-assessee filed the instant appeal before the High Court.

High Court Held

The High Court held that there was no factual or legal error committed by tax authorities in sustaining additions under section 68. On studying the bank account carefully, it was found that while Rs. 41 lakhs was deposited on 12th June 2010, within two days thereafter there was a debit with the narration “TRF to LIC MF Liquid Fund”.

This meant that said sum had been invested by the assessee in the liquid fund and not used for any investment in land or building on behalf of the assessee’s daughter.

The CIT(A) rightly disbelieved that the assessee was appointed as the general power of attorney holder for his daughter for entering into land/building transactions on behalf of his daughter. Since the funds were used by the assessee for his own investment, it strongly indicated that the source of investment i.e. the cash deposit of Rs. 41 lakhs also belong to him.

Thus, additions made by AO and sustained by the lower authority were to be upheld.

List of Cases Referred to

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied