Counselling Services to Foreign Institutions Treated as Export | SLP Dismissed
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 3 February, 2026

Case Details: Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax DGST Delhi vs. Global Opportunities (P.) Ltd. - [2026] 182 taxmann.com 881 (SC)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Dipankar Datta & Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ.
-
Tarun Gulati, Sr. Adv., Sparsh Bhargava, Ms Vanshika Taneja, Aryan Singh, Aakrit Bhargav, Advs., Ms Ishita Farsaiya and Bhakti Vardhan Singh, AORs for the Respondent, for the Petitioner.
Facts of the Case
The assessee, an educational consultancy, provided counselling services to Indian students for admission to foreign educational institutions and earned commissions. The assessee filed refund claims for tax paid on the claimed export of services, which the jurisdictional officer under GST rejected on the grounds that the services were intermediary in nature and that the category was incorrect. The Appellate Authority allowed the refunds, and the Department of Revenue challenged the decision, contending the assessee acted as an agent. The High Court held that it supplied services on its own account, invoices were raised on foreign institutions and payment received from abroad, so the services qualified as export and refund with statutory interest was payable. The matter was accordingly placed before the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court Held
The Hon’ble Supreme Court held that it was not inclined to interfere with the High Court’s order. The Court observed that the High Court had correctly interpreted the place of supply and export provisions under Section 13 read with Sections 2(6), 2(13) and 16 of the IGST Act, and refund provisions under Section 54 read with Section 56 of the CGST Act. The Supreme Court noted that the assessee did not arrange or facilitate a third party supply and therefore did not qualify as an intermediary, and that invoices raised on and consideration received from foreign institutions established the recipient outside India. The Court directed that the refund amount be paid within an extended period of two months and dismissed the special leave petition filed against the impugned order.
List of Cases Reviewed
- Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax DGST Delhi v. Global Opportunities (P.) Ltd. [2025] 179 taxmann.com 305 (Delhi) (Para 1) – SLP dismissed
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA