Communicating KAM Para in the Auditor’s Report is not a Substitute for Expressing a Modified Opinion | NFRA
- Blog|News|Account & Audit|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 9 October, 2023
Latest from Taxmann
The investigation conducted by the National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) revealed several critical issues in the company’s financial practices. These issues included unilaterally writing back significant liabilities and categorizing them as Other Income, as well as the adoption of a flawed accounting policy for valuing finished goods at the estimated market price instead of the more standard Lower of Cost or Net Realizable Value approach. In assessing the role of the auditor in these deficiencies, NFRA raised concerns about the following key aspects:
a) Auditor failed to comply with SA 505, External Confirmation, and SA 700, Forming an opinion and reporting on financial statements, by not re-assessing the risks posed by the restraint on their audit and not performing alternative audit procedures to mitigate such risk and given unmodified opinion ignoring the restraint imposed by the management on their independent audit.
b) Auditor failed to comply with SA 501 which mandates an auditor to attend the physical count of the inventory and if it is impracticable to attend the physical count and not possible to apply alternative audit procedures, then the auditor is required to modify the audit opinion. In current scenario, the auditor failed to modify his report on such lapse.
c) Auditor did not complied with SA 701 by adding KAM para in audit report without communicating the same with the management/ TCWG prior to their inclusion in the KAM.
d) Auditors were restrained from obtaining external confirmation in respect of the extinguishment of liabilities. Even then, the Auditors concluded that they had obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence and stated that the FS was free from material misstatements and issued unmodified opinion, thereby violating the principles of SA 705.
NFRA charged the auditors with a monetary penalty of Rs.5,00,000 and debarment of 3 years from being appointed as an auditor.
Click Here To Read The Full Story
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
