CIT(E) Can’t Deny 12A Registration for Lack of School Affiliation | ITAT
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 17 June, 2025

Case Details: Lakharaji Dadima Child Care Foundation vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption) - [2025] 175 taxmann.com 264 (Delhi-Trib.)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Ms Madhumita Roy, Judicial Member & Naveen Chandra, Accountant Member
-
Sanjay Jain, CA for the Appellant.
-
Ms Rishipal Bedi, CIT, DR for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The assessee-trust filed an application for registration under section 12A along with Form 10A. The application was filed to regularise its provisional registration granted under section 12A.
The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application for registration on the grounds that the trust was not for charitable purposes and that the school was not registered/affiliated with any state/central authority. Aggrieved assessee preferred an appeal to the Delhi Tribunal.
ITAT Held
The Delhi Tribunal held that the question as to whether any state or central authorities affiliate the assessee has no relevance to granting registration by the Commissioner (Exemption). Once the trust is registered under section 12A, its activities’ genuineness and compliance with any statutory requirements must be questioned to decide whether it is charitable or otherwise.
The Commissioner (Exemption) has no jurisdiction to reject the application for grant of registration on the premise that the play school is not registered/affiliated with any State or Central Government authority.
Thus, having regard to the entire aspect of the matter, it is deemed fit and proper to remit the issue to the file of the Commissioner (Exemption) for adjudication of the issue of granting registration under section 12A, taking into consideration all the relevant documents in support of the case made out by the assessee, and to pass a reasoned order upon granting an opportunity to be heard to the assessee.
List of Cases Reviewed
- ITO v. Chadha Education Society Maxfort Pre-Primary School [IT Appeal No. 91/Del/2016, dated 12-12-2018][Para 7] Followed
List of Cases Referred to
- Asstt. CIT v. Surat City Gymkhana [2008] 170 Taxman 612/300 ITR 214 (SC) (para 5)
- ITO v. Chadha Education Society Maxfort Pre-Primary School [IT Appeal No. 91/Del/2016, dated 12-12-2018] (para 5).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA