CCI order probe against Zomato and Swiggy for their alleged unfair trade practices
- Blog|Competition Law|News|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- Last Updated on 16 August, 2022
Case Details: National Restaurant Association of India (‘NRAI’) v. Zomato Ltd. (‘Zomato’) -  140 taxmann.com 632 (CCI)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Ashok Kumar Gupta, Chairperson, Ms. Sangeeta Verma & Bhagwant Singh Bishnoi, Member
Facts of the Case
The Zomato and Swiggy were providing service of app-based food ordering and delivery platform. The Informant, Association for Restaurant, had alleged contravention of section 3 by OPs. According to the informant, OPs were engaged in practice of data masking, where restaurant partners (RP) received no data about end-consumer to whom food was delivered, which created lack of transparency. It also alleged that commissions charged by OPs from RPs to tune of 20 per cent to 30 per cent, were extremely exorbitant.
Further, OPs delayed in making timely remittances and payment cycles, which started with 2-3 days from date of order had then increased to 7 days. In addition to protracted payment cycles, OPs also deducted arbitrary amounts/hidden charges from payments without RP ever knowing reason thereof.
Further, agreements which RPs had with OPs were one-sided and contained unfair conditions e.g. unilateral right to terminate services of RPs.
The CCI held that issues pertaining to delayed payment cycle, imposition of one-sided clauses in agreement, charging of exorbitant commission did not have an effect on competition. However, there existed a prima facie case with respect to some of conduct of OPs, which required an investigation by DG to determine whether conduct of OPs had resulted in contravention of provisions of section 3(1), read with section 3(4). Therefore, DG was directed to carry out a detailed investigation into matter.
List of Cases Referred to
- CCI v. Steel Authority of India Ltd.  7 taxmann.com 23/103 SCL 269 (SC) (para 30).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied