CBIC Instruction on ‘Westinghouse’ Judgement & its implications on ‘AUTO OEMs’

  • Blog|News|Advisory|GST & Customs|
  • < 1 minute
  • By Chetan Kulasri
  • |
  • Last Updated on 26 May, 2022

instructions issued on applicability of Judgement of ‘Westinghouse’ on ‘auto parts’

Taxmann’s Indirect Tax Research and Advisory Team

The CBIC recently has issued an instruction for its officers on applying the recent judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Westinghouse Saxby Farmer Ltd. [2021] 125 taxmann.com 243 (SC) for the classification ‘Auto parts’. In this document, the Taxmann’s Indirect Tax Research and Advisory Team has analysed the given judgment and the CBIC instruction.

Important research points covered:

a) Background of Westinghouse judgment of Supreme Court (Supra)

b) Instruction issued by CBIC

c) Relevance of HS Explanatory notes in classification

d) Impact of filing review petition on classification of auto parts

Click Here to see the Judgment
Click Here to Read the Full Notification

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com