Cancellation of GST Registration Without Following Proper Procedure and Assigning Reasons Is Invalid | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 20 August, 2024

Case Details: Sunil Kumar Singh v. State of U.P. - [2024] 165 taxmann.com 430 (Allahabad)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Alok Mathur, J.
- Utkarsh Misra & Abhishek for the Petitioner.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was running business of supplying goods and services. The GST department issued show cause notice to the petitioner for cancellation of registration due to non-filing of returns. The department passed cancellation order without assigning any reason and the appeal was dismissed on the ground of delay. It filed writ petition against the cancellation order.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the cancellation order was passed without following the procedure under Section 29 of UPGST Act. Also, the order of cancellation was passed mechanically without application of mind and without assigning any reason. The Court further noted that the quasi-judicial orders affecting fundamental rights must be reasoned to comply with Article 14 of the Constitution.
Therefore, the Court held that the impugned cancellation order was liable to be set aside and the matter was remanded to Adjudicating Authority to pass fresh order after considering petitioner’s reply and giving opportunity of hearing.
List of Cases Reviewed
- Om Prakash Mishra v. State of U.P. Writ Tax No. 100 of 2022 decided on 6.9.2022 [Para 9],
- Chandra Sain, Sharda Nagar Lucknow through its proprietor Mr. Chandar Jain v. U.O.I. Through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi Writ Tax No. 147 of 2022 decided on 22.9.2022 [Para 10]
- Whirlpool Corporation v. Registrar of Trademarks, Mumbai (1998) 8 SCC 1 [Para 11] followed.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA