Burden of proof on assessee to establish that non-filing of ITR was not willful; HC upholds prosecution
- Blog|Income Tax|News|
- 99 Views
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- Last Updated on 2 November, 2021
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- C.V. Karthikeyan, J.
- Naveen Kumar Murthi for the Petitioner.
- L. Murali Krishnan for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
Assessee filed the petition to quash the prosecution proceedings initiated against him owing to non-filing of return of income (ITR).
According to the Assessing Officer (AO), the assessee had not filed the Returns of Income for the Assessment Year 2013-2014 within the stipulated period. Further, no explanation was given with respect to the high valued transactions in the purchase and sale of mutual funds and transactions with credit cards.
Thus, AO held that there was a wilful and deliberate attempt on the part of the assessee to defraud the Income-tax Department by not filing the return of income.
Assessee contended that he had no intention of committing any offence much fewer offences under sections 276CC and 276C. He also stated that he was under the bonafide impression that his erstwhile employer, where he was working, would have filed the Tax Returns in the normal course.
High Court Held
The Madras High Court held that the assessee had laid the blame on his previous employer, stating that it was a bona fide mistake on the part of the former employer, and the assessee could not be held liable to answer to the charge levied by the AO.
It was also stated that even though the Show Cause Notices were received by assessee, he was under the bona fide impression that since tax had been paid, no further action was required to be clarified from his end.
This Court cannot presume that assessee herein is innocent of any of the offences complained. It is for the assessee to establish such innocence. The platform for establishing such innocence is the Court where the trial is to be conducted.
There is a statutory presumption prescribed in Section 278E. The Court has to presume the existence of the culpable mental state, and absence of such mental state can be pleaded by an accused as a defence in respect to the act charged as an offence in the prosecution.
Thus, the burden lies on the assessee to show that he had no wilful intention not to file the return. Any explanation to discharge such burden can be tested only during the course of the trial.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied