Bail Petition Granted due to Co-Accused’s Bail and No Evidence Tampering Allegation

  • Blog|News|Company Law|
  • 3 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 21 April, 2023

Bail; evidence tampering

Case Details: Taranjeet Singh Bagga @Sonu Singh v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office - [2023] 149 taxmann.com 106 (HC-Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Ms Swarana Kanta Sharma, J.
    • Abhik KumarRinku Mathur, Advs. for the Petitioner.
    • A. Ansari, Prosecutor & Tarun Srivastava, Adv. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the applicant filed a bail application u/s 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking regular bail for an offence punishable u/s 447 of the Companies Act, 2013.

An investigation by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) into the affairs of the accused company ‘PPPL’ revealed that the director of ‘PPPL’ i.e. ‘S’ used to procure plastic granules from large-scale public sector undertakings as well as from local suppliers. These granules were then sold in cash to local vendors without any tax invoices.

Whereas, tax invoices for these cash sales were issued to various entities including many related parties to adjust purchases. Similarly, tax invoices without any underlying goods were also issued to non-related parties who required them for availing of credit of duty (VAT).

Further, in order to carry out the said deception, several sham entities were formed by ‘S’ in the name of his relatives and employees.

The petitioner was the proprietor of one of the entities in which funds were routed by ‘S. The allegation against the petitioner was that he arranged documents and people in whose name fake entities and bank accounts were opened, which were subsequently used to route funds of ‘PPPL’.

Thus, the SFIO filed a complaint against the petitioner for committing an offence u/s 447 of the Companies Act, 2013 and the petitioner was taken into custody.

The High Court observed that the co-accused, the director of the accused company, had already been granted bail and there was no allegation that the petitioner could either intimidate any witnesses or tamper with evidence. Further, it was not the case of the prosecution that the petitioner did not join or cooperate in an investigation.

High Court Held

The High Court held that, considering the aforesaid discussion, and the fact that the petitioner was in judicial custody since 25-5-2022, the petitioner was to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

Accordingly, the present bail application stands disposed of.

List of Cases Referred to

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied