AO Must Record Satisfaction Before Case Transfer | HC
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- 4 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 20 January, 2026

Case Details: Paras Chandreshbhai Koticha vs. Income-tax Officer - [2026] 182 taxmann.com 204 (Gujarat)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- A.S. Supehia & Pranav Trivedi, JJ.
- Tushar Hemani, Sr. Adv., S.N. Divatia, B.S. Soparkar, Dhinal Shah, Vijay Patel, Ms. Vaibhavi Parikh, Manish J. Shah, Jimmy Patel & B.S. Soparkar, Advs. for the Petitioner.
- Varun K. Patel, Dev Patel, Aditya Bhatt, Karan Sanghani, Ms. Maithili Mehta & Maunil G Yajnik, Senior Standing Counsels for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The core issue before the Gujarat High Court was
“Whether the Assessing Officer can directly reopen assessments under Sections 147/148 of the Income-tax Act on the basis of material found during a search under Sections 132/132A, without first following the special procedure under Sections 153A/153C (including recording the mandatory satisfaction note), particularly in the case of a person other than the searched person.
High Court Held
The Gujarat High Court held as follows:
a) It is mandatory for the Assessing Officer of a “searched person” (Section 153A of the Act) to record satisfaction on the incriminating material found during the search under Sections 132/132A of the Act and communicate the same to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer of the “other/third person”.
b) In the absence of any satisfaction note recorded by the Assessing Officer of the searched person, the jurisdictional Assessing Officer of the other person cannot assume jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Act solely on the basis of material sent to him by the Assessing Officer of the searched person.
c) In other words, the “other person” cannot be subjected to assessment/reassessment under Section 153C of the Act on the material received by him sans a satisfaction note; hence, such an approach would be illegal, without jurisdiction, and liable to be quashed.
d) The jurisdictional Assessing Officer of the “other/searched person” (Section 153C) can invoke the provisions of Sections 147/148 of the Act only on the basis of material available to him from other sources, other than the incriminating material sent to him.
e) In case a satisfaction note is recorded on the incriminating material and transmitted to him/her, then the only recourse available to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer is to proceed under Section 153C of the Act and not under Sections 147/148 of the Act.
f) In the case of assessees who are subjected to reassessment under the provisions of Section 153A of the Act, the Assessing Officer cannot switch over or invoke the provisions of Sections 147/148 of the Act on the basis of incriminating material found during the search and seizure conducted under Sections 132 or 132A of the Act.
g) However, the Revenue cannot be restricted, barred, or left remediless from invoking the provisions of Sections 147/148 of the Act, subject to fulfillment of the conditions mentioned therein, and the assessment can be reopened on the basis of material collected post-search from any other independent source.
List of Cases Reviewed
- Manish Maheshwari v. Asstt.CIT [2007] 159 Taxman 258 (SC)/[2007] 289 ITR 341 (SC) (para 45)
- CIT v. Calcutta Knitwears [2014] 43 taxmann.com 446 (SC)/[2014] 223 Taxman 115 (SC)/[2014] 362 ITR 673 (SC) (para 46)
- Super Malls Private limited v. Pr. CIT (2020) 4 S.C.C. 581 (para 47)
- Pr. CIT v. Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd. [2023] 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC)/[2023] 293 Taxman 141 (SC)/[2023] 454 ITR 212 (SC) (para 53)
- Shyam Sunder Khandelwal v. Asstt. CIT [2024] 161 taxmann.com 255 (Rajasthan) (para 59)
- Sri Dinakara Suvarna v. Dy. CIT [2022] 143 taxmann.com 362 (Karnataka)/[2023] 454 ITR 21 (Karnataka) (para 59)
- Aditi Constructions v. Dy. CIT [2023] 151 taxmann.com 513 (Bombay)/[2023] 293 Taxman 710 (Bombay)/[2023] 454 ITR 456 (Bombay) (para 59)
- Pr. CIT v. Naveen Kumar Gupta [2024] 168 taxmann.com 574 (Delhi)/[2025] 479 ITR 586 (Delhi) (para 61)
- Heval Navinbhai Patel v. ITO [2021] 126 taxmann.com 82 (Gujarat)/[2021] 279 Taxman 24 (Gujarat) (para 65)
- Amar Jewellers Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT [2022] 137 taxmann.com 249 (Gujarat)/[2022] 444 ITR 97 (Gujarat) (para 66) Followed.
List of Cases Referred to
- Khandubhai Vasanji Desai v. Dy. CIT [1999] 103 Taxman 181 (Gujarat)/[1999] 236 ITR 73 (Gujarat) (para 17)
- Pr. CIT v. Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd. [2023] 149 taxmann.com 399 (SC)/[2023] 293 Taxman 141 (SC)/[2023] 454 ITR 212 (SC) (para 17)
- Shyam Sunder Khandelwal v. Asstt. CIT [2024] 161 taxmann.com 255 (Rajasthan) (para 17)
- Amar Jewellers Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT [2022] 137 taxmann.com 249 (Gujarat)/[2022] 444 ITR 97 (Gujarat) (para 25)
- Pr. CIT v. Naveen Kumar Gupta [2024] 168 taxmann.com 574 (Delhi)/[2025] 479 ITR 586 (Delhi) (para 30)
- Pr. CIT v. Agroha Fincap Ltd. [2025] 179 taxmann.com 185 (Delhi) (para 30)
- Heval Navinbhai Patel v. ITO [2021] 126 taxmann.com 82 (Gujarat)/[2021] 279 Taxman 24 (Gujarat) (para 37)
- Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal [2024] 167 taxmann.com 70 (SC)/[2024] 301 Taxman 238 (SC)/[2024] 469 ITR 46 (SC) (para 37)
- Manish Maheshwari v. Asstt.CIT [2007] 159 Taxman 258 (SC)/[2007] 289 ITR 341 (SC) (para 45)
- CIT v. Calcutta Knitwears [2014] 43 taxmann.com 446 (SC)/[2014] 223 Taxman 115 (SC)/[2014] 362 ITR 673 (SC) (para 46)
- Super Malls Private limited v. Pr. CIT (2020) 4 S.C.C. 581 (para 47)
- Sri Dinakara Suvarna v. Dy. CIT [2022] 143 taxmann.com 362 (Karnataka)/[2023] 454 ITR 21 (Karnataka) (para 59)
- Aditi Constructions v. Dy. CIT [2023] 151 taxmann.com 513 (Bombay)/[2023] 293 Taxman 710 (Bombay)/[2023] 454 ITR 456 (Bombay) (para 59)
- Sejal Jewellary v. Union of India [2025] 171 taxmann.com 846 (Bombay) (para 60).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA