AO couldn’t reject books of account merely on the grounds of decline in gross profit over past year: ITAT
- Blog|Income Tax|News|
- 65 Views
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- Last Updated on 10 November, 2021
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Sandeep Gosain, Judicial Member and Vikram Singh Yadav, Accountant Member
- Nikhilesh Kataria, (CA) for the Appellant.
- Smt. Runi Pal, (ACIT) for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
Assessee was engaged in trading of cardamom and various other commodities. He filed return showing gross profit (GP) rate of 0.38 per cent. The case was selected for scrutiny and Assessing Officer (AO) passed impugned ex parte order and rejected the books of account. He estimated GP rate of 0.69 per cent on declared sales and made addition to the total income. The matter listed before the Tribunal.
The assessee submitted complete documents and records before the Commissioner (Appeals) and the same were accepted as additional evidence. The CIT(A) remanded the case. In remand proceedings, AO accepted the trading results of the assessee. However the CIT(A) summarily rejected the remanded report and sustained the original trading addition. Assessee filed appeal before the Tribunal.
The Tribunal held that it is an admitted position of the revenue that past year results cannot be made a guiding factor to reject book of account. The assessee has also contended that given the exceptional circumstances where the turnover has increased by almost 130 times, the past year results are not reflective of state of affairs of current year.
The assessee had explained the substantial fall in GP rate due to fall in prices of cardamom where the prices had reduced by almost half the rate at the end of the year as compared to beginning of the year. There is nothing on record in terms of comparative profits declared in similar line of trade in commodities. Therefore, there was no rational basis for estimating the gross profit rate by the AO even where the books of account are rejected.
Therefore, AO wasn’t justified in estimating the gross profit rate even where the books of account are rejected. Thus, the trading additions so made by the AO and confirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals) was to be deleted.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied