AO can’t attach property of any person other than assessee while resorting provisions to sec. 281B: HC

  • Blog|News|Income Tax|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 17 June, 2022

attachment of property

Case Details: Raghunandan Enterprise v. ACIT - [2022] 139 taxmann.com 51 (Gujarat)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • J.b. Pardiwala & Ms Nisha M. Thakore, Jj.
    • B.S. Soparkar for the Petitioner.
    • Mrs Kalpanak Raval for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

A search and seizure were undertaken under section 132 at the premises of a person and many documents were seized that showed instances of tax evasion by the assessee. On the likelihood of huge demand, Assessing Officer (AO) passed an order of provisional attachment of various properties of the assessee under section 281B.

In the list of properties belonging to the assessee and one property was owned by partnership Firm. Said property was also attached on the ground that the assessee derived 2.50% share in the profit from one of the partners of the partnership firm.

Partnership Firm filed the writ petition before the Gujarat High Court against the action taken by AO.

High Court Held

The High Court held that the language of the provisions of section 281B is plain and simple which provides for the attachment of the property of the assessee only and no one else.

The golden rule of interpretation of the statutes is that the statute has to be construed according to its plain, literal, and grammatical meaning unless it leads to absurdity. The attached property in the given case didn’t belong to the assessee and thus couldn’t be provisionally attached.

There is a fine distinction between a case where a partner of a firm assigns his share in favour of a third person and a case where a partner constitutes a sub-partnership with his share in the main partnership. Assigning a percentage of a share in profit by a partner to a third person cannot be equated with the situation that a sub-partnership came into existence.

Considering the fact of the case, provisional attachment of property of partnership firm on the ground that the assessee was assigned share in profit by one of the partner was untenable.

List of Cases Reviewed

List of Cases Referred to

    • Addanki Narayanappa v. Bhaskara Krishnappa AIR 1966 SC 1300 (para 7)
    • CIT v. Sunil J. Kinariwala [2003] 126 Taxman 161/259 ITR 10 (SC) (para 11).

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied