Vague SCN Invalidates Retrospective GST Cancellation | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 11 April, 2026

Case Details: Bansal Casting vs. Union of India [2026] 185 taxmann.com 29 (Punjab & Haryana)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Mrs Lisa Gill & Ramesh Chander Dimri, JJ.
-
Ms Radhika Suri, Sr. Adv., Ms Parnika Singla, Abhinav Narang, J.S. Bedi & Aman Garg, Advs. for the Petitioner.
-
Saurabh Kapoor, R.S. Pandher, Addl. A.Gs., Ms Mamta Singla Talwar, DAG, Sourabh Goel & Ajay Kalra, Sr. Standing Counsels for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioners were issued show cause notices in Form GST REG-17 on generic grounds without proposing retrospective cancellation or furnishing documents relied upon. Subsequently, the jurisdictional officer under CGST passed cryptic, non-speaking cancellation orders with retrospective effect, without disclosing the basis, and, in certain cases, even from a prior date or after the application for voluntary cancellation. Aggrieved, the petitioners filed writ petitions challenging the validity of such notices and orders on grounds of violation of principles of natural justice and lack of proper reasoning. The matter was accordingly placed before the High Court.
High Court Held
The High Court held that retrospective cancellation under Section 29 of the CGST Act and Haryana GST Act, read with Rule 22 of the CGST Rules and Haryana GST Rules, requires due process, including proper notice and recorded reasons. It was observed that the absence of a proposal for retrospective cancellation and the non-supply of relied-upon documents denied an effective opportunity of defence. The Court held that cryptic, non-speaking and mechanical orders reflected non-application of mind and were unsustainable, and such defects could not be cured by post facto justifications. Accordingly, the impugned notices and orders were set aside to the extent of retrospective effect, with liberty to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law.
List of Cases Referred to
- Ajay Gupta v. Sales Tax Officer [2025] 179 taxmann.com 18 (Delhi) (para 6)
- Pooja Enterprises v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato [2025] 177 taxmann.com 765/111 GST 645 (Delhi) (para 6)
- Eworld Business Solutions (P.) Ltd. v. Superintendent, Range 94 Central GST [2025] 178 taxmann.com 236/102 GSTL 115 (Delhi) (para 6)
- Sunrise India v. Commissioner, Delhi GST [2024] 162 taxmann.com 378/104 GST 719/87 GSTL 484 (Delhi) (para 6)
- JSD Traders LLP v. Additional Commissioner, CGST [2025] 172 taxmann.com 551/97 GSTL 160 (Delhi) (para 6)
- Ravi Parkash Goel v. Sales Tax Officer, AVATO [2024] 162 taxmann.com 840 (Delhi) (para 6)
- Akash Bansal v. Superintendent, Central GST Department, Delhi West [2025] 177 taxmann.com 518 (Delhi) (para 6)
- V R Impex v. Commissioner of Delhi GST [2025] 177 taxmann.com 492 (Delhi) (para 6)
- Oryx Fisheries (P.) Ltd. v. UOI (2010) 13 SCC 427 (para 13)
- Riddhi Siddhi Enterprises v. Commissioner of GST (CGST) [2024] 167 taxmann.com 302/90 GSTL 257 (Delhi) (para 15)
- Godrej Sara Lee Ltd. v. Excise and Taxation Officer-Cum-Assessing Authority 2023 AIR SC 781 (para 21).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA