Provision for Performance Incentive Based on EBITDA | Ind AS
- Blog|News|Account & Audit|
- 3 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 25 February, 2026

1. Facts
Zenith Manufacturing Limited, hereinafter referred to as “the company”, is engaged in the manufacture of industrial equipment and prepares its financial statements in accordance with Ind AS.
As per its approved Remuneration Policy, the company pays a performance incentive to its senior management team, including the CEO and CFO. The incentive is computed as 4% of annual EBITDA, subject to the condition that EBITDA exceeds Rs. 40 crore.
The policy, however, states only that:
“Incentive shall be calculated at 4% of annual EBITDA.”
The policy does not clarify whether EBITDA is to be computed before or after charging the performance incentive expense.
For the financial year ended 31 March 2026:
- EBITDA before charging performance incentive (as per draft financials) is Rs. 50 crore.
- Estimated incentive at 4% amounts to Rs. 2 crore (if calculated before charging incentive).
- Statutory audit is completed in May 2026.
- Post-audit adjustments reduce EBITDA (before incentive) to Rs. 47 crore.
- The Board formally approves the incentive payout in June 2026.
While finalising financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2026, management faced the following issues:
(a) Whether a constructive obligation exists as at 31 March 2026 despite board approval being pending?
(b) Whether EBITDA for incentive computation should be considered before or after charging the incentive expense, given the policy is silent?
(c) Whether EBITDA can be reliably estimated before completion of audit adjustments?
2. Relevant Provisions
Ind AS 19 – Employee Benefits
Para 11
An entity shall recognise a liability when an employee has provided service in exchange for employee benefits to be paid in the future.
When an employee has rendered service to an entity during an accounting period, the entity shall recognise the undiscounted amount of short-term employee benefits expected to be paid in exchange for that service:
(a) as a liability (accrued expense), after deducting any amount already paid. If the amount already paid exceeds the undiscounted amount of the benefits, an entity shall recognise that excess as an asset (prepaid expense) to the extent that the prepayment will lead to, for example, a reduction in future payments or a cash refund.
(b) as an expense, unless another Ind AS requires or permits the inclusion of the benefits in the cost of an asset (see, for example, Ind AS 2, Inventories, and Ind AS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment).
Para 19
An entity shall recognise the expected cost of profit-sharing and bonus payments under paragraph 11 when, and only when:
(a) the entity has a present legal or constructive obligation to make such payments as a result of past events; and
(b) a reliable estimate of the obligation can be made. A present obligation exists when, and only when, the entity has no realistic alternative but to make the payments.
Ind AS 37 – Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
Para 14
A provision shall be recognised when:
(a) an entity has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event;
(b) it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation; and
(c) a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. If these conditions are not met, no provision shall be recognised.
Click Here To Read The Full Story
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA