Mandatory Pre-Deposit Cannot Be Waived | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 28 March, 2026

Case Details: Orsu Yadaiah vs. Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN), New Delhi [2026] 184 taxmann.com 454 (Telangana)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Aparesh Kumar Singh, CJ. & G.M. Mohiuddin, J.
-
K.P. Amarnath Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner.
-
Dominic Fernandes, Senior Standing Counsel, K. Sai Akarsh, learned Assistant Government Pleader, Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader & Arvind Kumar Kata, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner had paid the outstanding tax liability during the adjudication proceedings. Subsequently, the jurisdictional officer imposed a penalty and interest, following which the petitioner sought to file an appeal without making the statutory pre-deposit, contending that, since the tax had already been discharged, the pre-deposit requirement ought to be waived. The petitioner engaged in correspondence with Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN), seeking such exemption, during which the prescribed time limit for filing the appeal expired. The Department of Revenue submitted that GSTN had no authority to grant exemption from statutory pre-deposit under the applicable provisions. The matter was accordingly placed before the High Court.
High Court Held
The High Court held that Section 107 of the CGST Act and the Telangana GST Act mandatorily require payment of the prescribed pre-deposit for filing a first appeal, and no exemption from such a statutory requirement exists for any taxpayer. It was observed that payment of tax during adjudication does not substitute for or dispense with the obligation of pre-deposit, as the statutory scheme clearly distinguishes between the discharge of liability and the conditions for an appellate remedy. The Court held that any dispute regarding the correctness of tax, penalty, or interest must be raised on merits before the appellate authority and cannot be used as a ground to bypass the pre-deposit requirement. The Court granted liberty to file the appeal within two weeks, along with the required pre-deposit, and directed that the delay condonation application be considered.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA