HC Quashes Duplicate GST Orders on GSTR-2A/3B Mismatch
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 6 March, 2026

Case Details: Tvl. Vishagan Traders vs. Deputy State Tax Officer-2 [2026] 183 taxmann.com 664 (Madras)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Krishnan Ramasamy, J.
-
A. Satheesh Murugan for the Petitioner.
-
R.Suresh Kumar, AGP for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner challenged two assessment orders passed for the same tax period concerning mismatch between Form GSTR-2A and Form GSTR-3B. It was submitted that pursuant to a show cause notice, the first authority passed an order on the sole issue of GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B mismatch. Subsequently, another show cause notice (SCN) was issued and the second authority passed an order covering two issues, including the same mismatch, thereby separately quantifying the tax demand for the identical issue in both orders. It was contended that such duplication resulted in double taxation for the same subject matter. The matter was accordingly placed before the High Court.
High Court Held
The High Court held that the proceedings arose from an assessment under Section 73 of the CGST Act and the Tamil Nadu GST Act and that passing two separate orders on the identical issue of mismatch between Form GSTR-2A and Form GSTR-3B for the same period resulted in duplication and double taxation. The Court observed that service of SCN only through portal upload without furnishing the original notice and without granting personal hearing violated the principles of natural justice in the context of Section 75 read with Section 169 of the CGST Act and the Tamil Nadu GST Act. Accordingly, the Court quashed the order. The matter was remanded to the jurisdictional authority for fresh consideration subject to payment of 25% of the disputed tax.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA