Bail Granted in ITC Fraud Case After Investigation | HC
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 21 March, 2026

Case Details: Jaydeep Mukeshbhai Virani vs. State of Gujarat - [2026] 184 taxmann.com 349 (Gujarat)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Nikhil S. Kariel, J.
-
Apurva N Mehta for the Applicant.
-
Utkarsh R Sharma & Jay Mehta, Additional Public Prosecutor for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The applicant filed an application for regular bail in connection with proceedings. The allegations recorded by the investigating authorities, including the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) were that the applicant, being an active partner, had availed fraudulent ITC on inward supplies from 38 firms whose GST registrations had been cancelled ab initio on the ground of being non-existent. It was submitted that the applicant had been arrested and remained in judicial custody, and that the investigation had been completed and a complaint had already been filed before the competent authority. The matter was accordingly placed before the High Court.
High Court Held
The High Court held that since the investigation had been completed and the complaint had already been filed, no reasonable grounds existed to justify continued custody of the applicant. It was observed that the maximum punishment prescribed under Section 132 of the CGST Act had been taken into consideration. The Court analysed the principles governing bail, including the principles of personal liberty and the presumption of innocence, and found that these considerations weighed in favour of the applicant. Accordingly, the Court exercised its discretion to grant regular bail to the applicant, subject to prescribed conditions.
List of Cases Referred to
- Sanjay Chandra v. CBI [2012] 1 SCC 40 (para 7).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA