AO can’t Change Nature of Payment to Alter TDS Provision During Appeals: HC

  • Blog|News|Income Tax|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 13 April, 2023

TDS Provision

Case Details: DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt Ltd. v. JCIT - [2023] 149 taxmann.com 176 (Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Vibhu Bakhru & Amit Mahajan, JJ.
    • Ms Kavita JhaVaibhav KulkarniAnant MannHimanshu AgarwalYuvraj SinghChetan Kumar ShuklaSalil KapoorMs Ananya KapoorUtkarsh Kumar GuptaSumit LalchandaniSanat Kapoor, Advs. for the Petitioner.
    • Sunil AgarwalShivansh B. PandyaUtkarsh TiwariShailendera SinghMs Dacchita ShahiAkash SaxenaAbhishek KhannaN.K. AggarwalMs Aakanksha KaulPuneet RaiAshvini KumarMs Madhavi ShuklaZoheb HossainSanjeev MenonNiraj Kumar, Advs. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

Assessee was a company incorporated in India and engaged in the business of developing real estate. During the relevant assessment year, the assessee entered into an agreement with the State Government of Haryana for setting up the Group Housing Colony in Gurgaon District. As per the agreement, assessee was required to pay External Development Charges (EDC) to Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA).

During the proceedings, the Assessing Officer (AO) demonstrated that said payments were in nature of rent, and the tax must have been deducted under section 194-I. Unsatisfied by the assessee’s response, the AO treated the assessee as “assessee-in-default” and quantified the demand under section 201(1) and section 201(1A).

Aggrieved by the order, the assessee filed a writ petition to the Delhi High Court wherein the counsel appearing for the department contended to withhold the tax under section 194C instead of 194I.

High Court Held

The High Court held that the department counsel readily admitted that Section 194-I was not applicable and the payment of EDC cannot be construed as rent attracting the obligation to deduct TDS at the rate of 10% on the said payment. According to him, the AO had erroneously mentioned that TDS was required to be deducted under Section 194-I instead of Section 194C.

The question as to the nature of EDC payment was squarely one of the issues that were required to be addressed by the AO. He had concluded that the same was ‘rent’ as it was in nature of an arrangement to use land. It is not open for the revenue to now contend that EDC charges are payments made to a contractor under a contract and not ‘rent’ under an arrangement to use land.

Revenue does not seek to support the decision of the AO that the charges are ‘rent’ or in the nature of ‘rent’. The fundamental reasoning on which the impugned order rests is fundamentally flawed.

The revenue appears to be approaching the issue from quite the reverse direction; it has, for an inexplicable reason, concluded that assessees ought to deduct tax and now seeks to find provisions of law to sustain the said conclusion. Thus, the order of AO was liable to be set aside.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied