AO can’t ask Start-up to submit bank statements/ITRs of reputed NR investors: ITAT

  • Blog|News|Income Tax|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 17 October, 2022

Section 68

Case Details: Raw Pressery (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT - [2022] 143 taxmann.com 158 (Mumbai-Trib.)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Aby T. Varkey, Judicial Member & S. Rifaur Rahman, Accountant Member
    • J.D. MistryMadhur Agarawal and Dhanesh Bafna for the Appellant.
    • Prakash Mane, (DR) for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

Assessee was a start-up company that had the expertise to produce healthy fruit juices without adding any preservatives. Its case was selected for scrutiny under the CASS in which one of the parameters was the fresh issue of share capital during the year. The assessee had received share premium from reputed foreign investors.

The assessee had furnished the brief background of the foreign investors along with their financial statements, PAN, Tax Residency Certificate, GBL License, and Certificate of Incorporation.

The Assessing Officer (AO) asked for their IT returns, bank statements, etc. which the assessee refused to provide citing reasons that investors are reputed foreign entities over whom it does not exercise influence so as to compel them to furnish their confidential documents.

AO rejected the assessee’s contentions and made additions under section 68 which was further confirmed by the CIT(A). Aggrieved-assessee filed the instant appeal before the Tribunal.

ITAT Held

The Tribunal held that for the purposes of Section 68, the ‘burden to proof’ begins with the assessee. Once the assessee submits evidence in support of the credit and makes out a prima facie case, then the ‘onus of proof’ shifts to the Revenue.

If the evidence on record weighs in favor of the assessee or if the explanation put forth cannot be said to be completely unsatisfactory, then the onus cast upon the assessee under section 68 can be said to have been discharged.

Thus, the initial burden on the assessee was only to substantiate the source of its share premium in as much as the identity and creditworthiness of the investors along with the genuineness of the transaction.

It is noted that the assessee had furnished the relevant foreign inward remittance certificates, FC-GPRs, etc. in support of the foreign investment received in accordance with the regulations of the Reserve Bank of India.

These investors are noted to be of repute holding Category-I Global License issued under the laws of Mauritius. Their financial statements also show that they had sufficient funds to make investment in the capital of the assessee. The assessee had also provided the PAN details of these foreign investors.

If AO had even a remote suspicion regarding the foreign investors, he ought to have made an appropriate independent inquiry through proper channels, rather than simply rejecting the documents furnished by the assessee.

Therefore, the addition made by the AO under section 68 was unjustified.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied