[Analysis] CCFS 2026 | MCA Scheme to Clear Pending Company Filings
- Blog|Company Law|
- 8 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 1 March, 2026

Companies Compliance Facilitation Scheme 2026 (CCFS-2026) is a one-time compliance window introduced by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) vide General Circular No. 01/2026 dated February 24, 2026, under the powers conferred by section 460 read with section 403 of the Companies Act, 2013. The scheme is operational from April 15, 2026, to July 15, 2026, and allows defaulting companies to regularise their long-pending statutory filings — including annual returns and financial statements — by paying only 10% of the total additional fees otherwise applicable. Beyond fee relief, the scheme also offers inactive or defunct companies a structured pathway to either obtain dormant status under section 455 by filing e-form MSC-1 at 50% of the normal fee, or to apply for voluntary strike-off via e-form STK-2 at just 25% of the applicable filing fees. The primary objective of CCFS-2026 is not merely to condone past defaults but to drive proactive compliance, clean up the MCA-21 corporate registry, and establish long-term regulatory discipline — marking a clear policy shift from the earlier settlement-based approach under the Company Law Settlement Scheme (CLSS) to a compliance-facilitation framework.
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Background – Why CCFS Matters?
- Options Available to Companies Under CCFS
- What Makes CCFS 2026 Different from Past Schemes?
- Period of Operation of CCFS
- Applicability of the Scheme
- What Forms are Covered Under the Scheme?
- Core Benefit Under the Scheme – Reduction in Additional Fees
- Additional Compliance Pathways Under the Scheme
- Immunity from Penalty Proceedings
- What if the Company Fails to File Pending Forms Under the Scheme?
- Conclusion
1. Introduction
The MCA, through General Circular No. 01/2026 dated February 24, 2026, has introduced the Companies Compliance Facilitation Scheme, 2026 (CCFS-2026). The scheme offers companies a one-time window to complete long-pending statutory filings at reduced additional fees.
Beyond the fee relief, the intent is to bring records up to date and improve overall compliance standards. It also enables inactive or defunct companies to move towards dormancy or strike-off at a lower cost, helping clean up and streamline the corporate registry.
2. Background – Why CCFS Matters?
The Companies Act, 2013, requires all companies to file their annual returns and financial statements. Fees for filing such statements, documents, returns, etc., are governed by section 403 of the Companies Act, 2013, read with the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014. With effect from July 1, 2018, delays in filing annual returns and financial statements attract an additional fee of Rs 100 per day, without any upper limit, often resulting in substantial financial liability for companies with long-pending defaults.
The Ministry has undertaken several initiatives to promote ease of doing business for corporates. However, the number of inactive companies has crossed the 20-lakh mark, and the Ministry has received representations from various stakeholders, including such companies, requesting a waiver of additional fees through a scheme.
To provide a one-time opportunity for companies to file their documents related to annual return and financial statements in the MCA-21 registry or to file for dormancy/closure, the Central Government, in exercise of powers under section 460 read with section 403 of the Companies Act, 2013, has decided to condone the delay in filing documents with the Registrar through a Scheme, namely the “Companies Compliance Facilitation Scheme, 2026”.
3. Options Available to Companies Under CCFS
Under the Scheme, companies/inactive companies have the option to:
- Get their pending annual filings completed by paying only 10% of the total additional fees payable on account of delays or
- Get their companies declared as ‘dormant company’ under section 455 of the Act by filing e-form MSC-1 and paying half of the normal fee payable under the rules.
- Get their companies struck off by filing an application in e-form STK-2 during the currency of the scheme by paying 25% of the filing fees.
4. What Makes CCFS 2026 Different from Past Schemes?
All earlier MCA amnesty initiatives were structured under the title “Company Law Settlement Scheme” (CLSS), which operates as a one-time settlement window that permits defaulting companies to regularise their pending filings by paying 25% of the applicable additional fees. The emphasis was on ‘settlement’, a curative mechanism designed to resolve past non-compliances.
However, the present scheme has been consciously titled the “Companies Compliance Facilitation Scheme” (CCFS). The shift in nomenclature is not merely cosmetic. It reflects a clear policy transition. The Government has moved from a settlement-based approach to a compliance-driven facilitation framework. The focus is no longer just on condoning past defaults, but on ensuring timely compliance and maintaining an accurate corporate registry.
The CCFS 2026 is also being projected as a one-time opportunity. Companies that do not regularise their defaults during this period should not assume that another similar window will follow. After the scheme closes, the normal penal and adjudication provisions under the Companies Act will apply in full force.
In furtherance of this objective, the financial barriers to voluntary exit have been significantly reduced. The strike-off filing fee has been reduced from Rs 10,000 to Rs 2,500, making closure a viable and economical option for defunct entities.
In essence, the evolution from ‘Settlement’ to ‘Compliance Facilitation’ signals a policy shift towards proactive governance, registry clean-up, stricter enforcement post-window and long-term regulatory discipline.
Comparison Table – CCFS 2026 vs. CLSS
| Feature | Old Scheme (CLSS) | CCFS 2026 |
| Scheme name | Company Law Settlement Scheme, 2014 | Companies Compliance Facilitation Scheme, 2026 |
| Nature | One-time settlement | Compliance facilitation |
| Eligibility | Defaulting companies with pending filings | All companies except the specified excluded categories |
| Scheme Period | 15 Aug 2014 – 15 Oct 2014 | 15 April 2026 – 15 July 2026 |
| Forms Covered | Limited set of annual filing and related forms | A wider list of forms is covered |
| Additional Fees Relief | Pay only 25% of the actual additional fee payable | Pay only 10% of the additional fee |
| Dormant status option
|
MSC-1 filing at 25% of the fee | MSC-1 filing at 50% of the fee |
| Strike-off option
|
FTE form at 25% fee | STK-2 form at 25% fee |
| Exceptions (Who cannot apply for the scheme)
|
Companies facing strike-off action, applied for strike-off/dormancy, and vanishing companies. | Companies facing strike-off action, companies that applied for strike-off/dormancy, companies that have vanished, and companies dissolved via amalgamation. |
Comparison Table – CCFS 2026 vs. CODS 2018
| Feature | CODS-2018 | CCFS 2026 |
| Scheme name | Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018 | Companies Compliance Facilitation Scheme, 2026 |
| Eligibility | Defaulting companies that failed to file financial statements/annual returns for a continuous period of 3 years | All companies except for the specified exclusions. |
| Scheme Period
|
01 January 2018 – 31 March 2018 | 15 April 2026 – 15 July 2026 |
| Exceptions (Who cannot apply for the scheme)
|
Companies that have been struck off/whose names have been removed from the ROC under section 248(5) of the Companies Act. | Companies facing strike-off action, companies that applied for strike-off/dormancy, companies that have vanished, and companies dissolved via amalgamation. |
| Additional Fees payable
|
Additional fee payable as per section 403 of the Companies Act, read with Companies (Registration Offices and Fee) Rules, 2014 | Pay only 10% of the additional fee. |
| Dormant company option
|
Not provided | Allowed – MSC-1 at 50% of the normal filing fee |
| Strike-off Option
|
Not specifically provided | STK-2 permitted at 25% of the filing fee |
| Post-Scheme Consequence
|
DINs are deactivated on expiry of the scheme period | ROC to take action against non-compliant companies |
| Forms Covered
|
Limited scope (only specified overdue documents are allowed) | A wider list of forms is covered |
5. Period of Operation of CCFS
The scheme shall be operational from 15.04.2026 to 15.07.2026.
6. Applicability of the Scheme
All companies are permitted to file relevant e-forms that were due for filing on any given date in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Compliance Facilitation Scheme, 2026, except for the following:
- Companies against which final notice for strike-off under section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013 (previously section 560 of the Companies Act, 1956) has already been initiated.
- Companies that have themselves filed a strike-off application.
- Companies that have applied for obtaining dormant status under section 455 of the Act before the scheme.
- Companies that have been dissolved pursuant to a scheme of amalgamation
- Vanishing companies[1]
7. What Forms are Covered Under the Scheme?
The Scheme applies to “relevant e-forms” relating to:
Companies Act, 2013 Forms
- MGT-7 – Annual Return
- MGT-7A – Annual Return (OPC and Small Company)
- AOC-4 – Financial Statements
- AOC-4 CFS – Consolidated Financial Statements
- AOC-4 NBFC (Ind AS) – Financial Statements
- AOC-4 CFS NBFC (Ind AS) – CFS
- AOC -4 (XBRL) – Financial Statements in XBRL
- ADT-1 – Appointment of Auditor
- FC – 3 – Annual Accounts (Foreign Company)
- FC – 4 – Annual Return (Foreign Company)
Legacy Forms under Companies Act, 1956
- Form 20B – Annual Return
- Form 21A – Annual Return (Small Company)
- Form 23AC – Balance Sheet
- Form 23ACA – Profit & Loss Account
- Form 23AC-XBRL – Balance Sheet (XBRL)
- Form 23ACA-XBRL – Profit & Loss Account (XBRL)
- Form 66 – Compliance Certificate
- Form 23B – Intimation of appointment of auditor
8. Core Benefit Under the Scheme – Reduction in Additional Fees
Every company must be required to pay the fees on the filing of each relevant e-form as per the following:
| Type of Fees | Amount |
| Normal Fees | As prescribed under the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014 |
| Additional Fees | Only 10% of the additional fees as prescribed under the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014 |
9. Additional Compliance Pathways Under the Scheme
Every company that files an application for obtaining the status of a ‘dormant company’ under section 455 in e-form MSC-1 must pay a fee of one-half of the normal filing fees applicable in this regard.
Further, every company that applies for striking off by filing e-form STK-2 must be required to pay only 25% of the applicable filing fees under the Companies (Removal of Name of Companies from the Registrar of Companies) Rules, 2016.
10. Immunity from Penalty Proceedings
The most valuable aspect of the scheme is the conditional immunity framework.
- Where No Adjudication Order is Passed – If filings are made before issuance of notice by the adjudicating authority or within 30 days of issuance of notice, then proceedings under section 92 or 137 shall be concluded, and no penalty shall be levied.
- Where an Adjudication Order is Already Passed – If the period of 30 days after issuance of notice for adjudication has expired or where the adjudication order imposing penalty for defaults under section 92 or 137 has already been passed, then liability to pay penalties remains unaffected.
Further, for forms such as ADT-1, FC-3, FC-4, and legacy forms, immunity from prospective penal action is available, provided no prosecution has been initiated before filing under the Scheme.
11. What if the Company Fails to File Pending Forms Under the Scheme?
The MCA has issued a clear warning. If the company remains non-compliant after the scheme window closes on 15 July 2026, the Registrars of Companies may exercise adjudication powers to take action against entities that have not availed themselves of the scheme, which could result in significant financial penalties.
12. Conclusion
The Companies Compliance Facilitation Scheme, 2026, shows a clear change in approach. Instead of giving repeated settlement windows, the Ministry is now pushing companies to get their filings up to date in a structured way. With additional fees capped at 10 per cent and lower fees for dormancy and strike-off, it provides genuine relief to companies seeking to clear old defaults.
At the same time, the window is open for only three months, and the message is clear: strict action will follow once it closes. The idea is to update the registry and improve compliance in the future.
Companies should treat this as a serious opportunity. It is a chance to correct past gaps, reduce future risk and decide whether to continue the company or close it properly.
[1] An explanation to Rule 3 of the Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Rules, 2016
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied


CA | CS | CMA