AIF Fund Due Diligence – Investor Perspective | Key Man Clause | Document Checklist

Fund due diligence is the investigation an investor carries out on an Alternative Investment Fund and its Investment Manager before committing capital. Because AIFs are marketed privately and their information is not publicly available, the burden sits with the investor rather than the regulator. The process covers the Manager's track record over at least five years, the composition and experience of the investment team, disciplinary history, key-person risk, the fund's legal documents, and how conflicts of interest are identified and handled. The Private Placement Memorandum is the starting point, not the whole of it.

Table of Contents

1. Why AIF Due Diligence Works Differently
2. Where the Information Comes From
3. Evaluating the Investment Manager
4. The Key Man Clause
5. Due Diligence on the Legal Documents
6. Conflicts of Interest
7. A Working Checklist
8. Frequently Asked Questions

Check out NISM's Alternative Investment Fund Managers, the official NISM workbook for the Series XIX-C Certification Examination, published by Taxmann. It carries a full illustrative fund due diligence questionnaire as a practitioner annexure, covering fund structure, track record, investment process, team, debt-specific enquiries and a checklist of documents to be reviewed, drafted for direct use by an investor diligence team or by a Manager preparing to answer one.

1. Why AIF Due Diligence Works Differently

Due diligence in most contexts means verifying what has been publicly disclosed. In an AIF, there is very little public disclosure to verify.

AIF products are marketed privately and are meant for informed investors. The regulatory design assumes those investors will investigate for themselves before committing, which is a different premise from a public issue where the prospectus carries the burden. Fund selection is one of the principal drivers of outcome in AIF investing, so the quality of the diligence directly determines the quality of the result.

The investor has two things to establish. First, that the proposed investment meets their own objective and matches their risk appetite. Second, and harder, that the Investment Manager can actually deliver, since so much of the outcome rests on the Manager’s judgement rather than on the terms of the scheme.

From the Manager’s side there is a corresponding obligation of service: giving investors enough information to reach an informed decision. Distributors have a role here too, in helping investors extract what they need from the fund documents and from direct contact with the fund office.

1.1 The problem with subjectivity

Diligence works by cross-referencing and cross-checking. Where comparable funds and comparable data do not exist, the analysis becomes highly subjective, and the weight falls on qualitative judgement.

That has a cost, and it runs in one direction. Newer funds are frequently passed over not because the fundamentals are weak but because not every diligence point can be evidenced. Consider a sector-specific infrastructure fund whose Manager has genuine expertise in opportunities opened up by recent policy change. The Manager cannot produce prior transactions in a space that has only just opened. An investor screening on evidence alone will reject the fund for the absence of a track record that could not have existed.

A related shortcut is worth naming. Once a reputable institutional investor commits, other investors often treat that commitment as proof that proper diligence was done. It is not. It is somebody else’s judgement, made against somebody else’s objectives.

2. Where the Information Comes From

The Private Placement Memorandum is the main source, because AIF information is not publicly available. It is not sufficient on its own.

Additional information has to be collected directly from the fund house or the office of the Investment Manager, and how well an investor manages that collection is itself a source of competitive advantage. Two investors reading the same PPM can reach materially different conclusions depending on what else they asked for and received.

A structured questionnaire is the practical answer. From the Manager’s side, the same document works in reverse: a well-built set of FAQs anticipating what a diligence team will ask reduces the burden on both parties and demonstrates the Manager’s own organisation.

3. Evaluating the Investment Manager

The workbook sets out six criteria that weigh most heavily on the investor’s assessment of a Manager: fund management experience in earlier assignments; performance track record in delivering returns; specific expertise in the proposed fund’s investment strategy; expertise in exit management and successful past exits; litigations, write-downs, write-offs, liquidations or other adverse events in past fund management; and instances of conflict of interest, strained investor relations, regulatory non-compliance or litigation with investee companies or investors that reflect on the conduct of the Manager. Four of these repay closer examination.

3.1 Track record

Historical performance of funds and investments previously managed should be analysed over a minimum of five years. Three questions matter: did the Manager run a fund of comparable size, did it deliver for the investors in that fund, and did it invest in the same asset classes and industries this fund is targeting.

A strong record in a different asset class is a weaker signal than it appears.

3.2 The investment management team

The Manager should have relevant exposure and experience in the same asset class the fund will target. The team’s past experience carries equal weight, and the review should extend across equity research, trade execution, order management, sales, compliance and fund administration rather than stopping at the named principals.

Minutes of Investment Committee meetings should be reviewed. They show how investment decisions actually get made and approved, which is often different from how the process is described.

3.3 Disciplinary history

The Manager, the Sponsor and their respective partners, directors, associates and Trustees should have no outstanding litigation in which they have been found guilty, over a minimum period of five years.

The wider check covers criminal or civil prosecution, disputes, non-payment of statutory dues, past defaults against banks or financial institutions, proceedings for economic or civil offences, disciplinary action by SEBI or any other regulator, penalties levied, and disputed tax liabilities.

3.4 Key-person risk

In an AIF the investment managers are the key persons. They make the investment decisions, meet redemption requests, ensure compliance and execute trades. Death, incapacity, insanity or unavailability of the Manager can significantly disrupt the fund’s operations and, through that, the net return to investors.

The test is concentration. Investors, directly or through their representatives, should hold on-site meetings with the Manager and the whole team across investment management, trade execution, research and compliance. The purpose is to establish what each member actually does, and whether the fund depends on the actions of one person.

3.5 Exit capability

Expertise in exit management and a record of successful exits sit alongside the entry-side track record. A Manager who invests well and exits badly produces a portfolio that looks strong on RVPI and delivers little on DPI.

3.6 Conduct history

Instances of conflict of interest, strained relations with investors, non-compliance with regulators, and litigation with investee companies or with investors all reflect on how the Manager conducts itself. So do past litigations, write-downs, write-offs and liquidations in previously managed funds.

4. The Key Man Clause

A key man clause is a contractual provision that prohibits the AIF or the management company from making new investments if one or more key persons are no longer available to devote the necessary time to the investment.

A key man is an important employee or executive of the investment management company, including the managing partner or director, who is critical to fund management. The clause functions as an assurance to investors that the senior and most qualified people are the ones handling important decisions. Because AIF investments remain in place for years, the continued availability of those people is a live concern throughout the fund’s life, not just at commitment.

4.1 Super key persons and standard key persons

Indian practice has been evolving as senior talent leaves asset management companies to launch their own funds. Managers are broad-basing teams and increasing the commitment of key personnel, and a two-tier structure has become common.

Take a fund with four founding partners, all involved in day-to-day management. Two are senior partners responsible for capital commitments and investor relationships; two oversee the fund management function. The senior pair can be designated super key persons and the other two standard key persons, with a few senior investment team members, such as transaction team leaders or those responsible for reporting, also included as standard key persons.

4.2 What investors typically negotiate

Investors usually ask for a compulsory redemption or exit without charges on a key man event, unless a suitable replacement is found within pre-agreed timelines and SEBI is informed.

What gets negotiated in practice is who is designated a key person and at which tier, and the pre-agreed timeline within which a replacement must be found.

5. Due Diligence on the Legal Documents

Four documents beyond the PPM repay close reading.

5.1 Subscription or Contribution Agreement

This records the fund’s terms and conditions, the distribution mechanism, the list of expenses the fund will bear and the powers of the Investment Committee. It sets out the investor’s capital commitment and records the representations and warranties the investor makes about its own legal qualification to invest.

The single most important check is consistency. Every term in the agreement should be verified against the PPM, and any difference or discrepancy that could affect the investor’s rights or liabilities identified before signature. The terms of the agreement cannot go beyond the PPM.

Note the naming: a Subscription Agreement is signed when investing in offshore funds, a Contribution Agreement when investing in onshore funds.

5.2 Investment Advisory Agreement

An AIF based in an International Financial Services Centre such as GIFT City, and foreign investors investing in domestic AIFs, may delegate the investment management and advisory function to a third party investment advisor. The agreement sets out the terms on which that advisor gives advice.

An investor should review the advisor’s professional qualification and experience, the terms of appointment and any potential conflicts of interest.

One point of law matters here and is frequently misunderstood. The investment advisor sits above and in addition to the Investment Manager. It cannot replace the Manager, because investment management is a core function of an AIF and cannot be outsourced.

5.3 Indenture of Trust

The Indenture of Trust, or trust deed, determines the tax liability of institutional investors and their beneficial ownership in the trust structure of the AIF. It records whether the trust is determinate or indeterminate, and the tax rates that follow from that. An institutional investor reads it to establish two things: its legal beneficial ownership in the trust indenture, and whether tax on the income earned is payable by the fund or by the investor.

5.4 Investor Side Letters

Some institutional investors seek preferential treatment or tax exemptions from the Investment Manager, depending on the size of their capital commitment. Side letters record those terms: a lower management fee, participation in investment committee meetings, tax exemptions. An institutional investor negotiates them on the strength of its own due diligence findings.

The fund may issue a unique class of units to investors offered differential terms. The point to watch is the other side of that arrangement, because the Investment Manager owes a fiduciary duty to the remaining investors in the fund. An investor reading a side letter should be asking not only what it gets, but what other investors have already been given.

6. Conflicts of Interest

Conflicts are not exceptional in fund management. They are structural, and the question at diligence is whether the Manager has identified them and built a procedure, or has merely disclosed that they exist.

The PPM must disclose both the conflicts and the procedures to identify and address them. An investor assessing this should read past the disclosure to the mechanism: who decides when a conflict arises, whether the Investment Committee or Investor Advisory Committee has a role, and what happens when the Manager’s interest and the fund’s diverge on a specific transaction.

Common areas to probe are allocation of an opportunity between two funds managed by the same Manager, co-investment rights and how they are allocated among investors, transactions with affiliates of the Manager, and side letters granting terms to some investors that are not available to others.

7. A Working Checklist

The diligence questionnaire in the workbook is exhaustive. This is the short version, being the documents an investor should obtain and read before committing.

Document	What it establishes
Trust deed, LLP deed or memorandum and articles	The fund’s constitution and the Trustee’s powers
Investment Management Agreement	The Manager’s mandate, duties and removal terms
Fund accountant and custodian agreements	Who holds the assets and who computes the numbers
One client subscription agreement, on a no-name basis	The terms other investors have actually accepted
Sample valuation reports of portfolio companies1	The methodology behind reported RVPI and NAV
Annual audited report of the fund	Independently verified position
Sample investor reporting documents	What the investor will actually receive, and how often
Latest annual Compliance Test Report filed with SEBI	The Manager’s own compliance self-assessment
Sample investment memorandum to the Investment Committee	How a deal is actually argued and approved
Sample Investment Committee minutes, where documented	Whether the process described is the process followed
Sample external due diligence report on a past investment	The depth of the Manager’s own diligence

Institutional allocators and family offices running this process, or Managers preparing to be on the receiving end of it, can take specific structuring and documentation questions to Taxmann Advisory. For the SEBI circulars, the AIF Regulations and the disclosure standards referred to throughout, see Taxmann.com | Research. To check a provision or a definition while reviewing documents, Taxmann.ai answers questions directly from Taxmann’s research database.

8. Frequently Asked Questions

8.1 What is fund due diligence?

The process of investigation and evaluation an investor performs on a potential fund investment, covering its operations, its management and the verification of material facts. For an AIF it extends to the Manager’s track record, team, disciplinary history and the fund’s legal documents.

8.2 Why is due diligence on an AIF the investor’s responsibility?

AIF products are marketed privately to informed investors, and information about them is not publicly available. The regulatory framework assumes the investor will investigate before committing, rather than relying on public disclosure.

8.3 What is a key man clause?

A contractual clause preventing the AIF or its management company from making new investments if one or more designated key persons are no longer available to devote the necessary time to the fund. Investors typically negotiate a compulsory exit without charges on a key man event unless a replacement is found within an agreed period.

8.4 How far back should a Manager’s track record be checked?

At least five years. The same five-year period applies to the check on outstanding litigation in which the Manager, Sponsor, partners, directors, associates or Trustees have been found guilty.

8.5 Can an AIF outsource investment management to an advisor?

No. An investment advisor may be appointed in addition to the Investment Manager, and often is where the fund sits in an IFSC or has foreign investors, but investment management is a core function of an AIF and cannot be outsourced. The advisor cannot replace the Manager.

8.6 What is the difference between a subscription agreement and a contribution agreement?

They record substantially the same commercial terms. A Subscription Agreement is signed when investing in an offshore fund; a Contribution Agreement is signed when investing in an onshore fund.

---

1. SEBI Circular No. SEBI/HO/AFD/PoD/CIR/2023/97 dated 21 June 2023.