CARO 2016: Companies Auditor Report Order
- Account & Audit|Blog|
- 1190 Views
- 6 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- Last Updated on 28 February, 2022
CARO stands for Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order. It is an order which lists down the matters on which an auditor is required to report. Section 143 of Companies Act, 2013 mandates reporting on CARO.
CARO was introduced to get reports on certain matters that Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) deemed important. Thus, auditor of those entities on which CARO is applicable is required to report on the clauses given under this order after performing procedures for verification on the matters enumerated.
Effective date of CARO:
CARO 2016 was issued that superseded the order introduced in 2015. So now CARO 2016 is applicable and it is applicable from financial year 2015-16.
Requirements of CARO:
An auditor is required to report following matters in his report:
(i) Fixed Assets:
(a) Whether the company is maintaining proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets; (b) Whether these fixed assets have been physically verified by the management at reasonable intervals; whether any material discrepancies were noticed on such verification and if so, whether the same have been properly dealt with in the books of account; (c) Whether the title deeds of immovable properties are held in the name of the company. If not, provide the details thereof;
Whether physical verification of inventory has been conducted at reasonable intervals by the management and whether any material discrepancies were noticed and if so, whether they have been properly dealt with in the books of account;
(iii) Loan (Section 189 of Companies Act, 2013):
Whether the company has granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms, Limited Liability Partnerships or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013. If so, (a) Whether the terms and conditions of the grant of such loans are not prejudicial to the company’s interest; (b) Whether the schedule of repayment of principal and payment of interest has been stipulated and whether the repayments or receipts are regular; (c) If the amount is overdue, state the total amount overdue for more than ninety days, and whether reasonable steps have been taken by the company for recovery of the principal and interest;
(iv) Loans, investments, guarantees, and security (Section 185 and 186 of Companies Act, 2013):
In respect of loans, investments, guarantees, and security whether provisions of section 185 and 186 of the Companies Act, 2013 have been complied with. If not, provide the following details (as CARO requires company’s auditor to state his reasons for unfavourable or qualified opinion). It requires the following: (1) Where any unfavourable or qualified answer is given for the matters stated above (Para 3 of CARO), auditor’s report shall also state the basis for such unfavourable or qualified answer, as the case may be. (2) Where the auditor is unable to express any opinion on any specified matter (enumerated above), his report shall indicate such fact together with the reasons as to why it is not possible for him to give his opinion on the same.
In case, the company has accepted deposits, whether the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of sections 73 to 76 or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and the rules framed thereunder, where applicable, have been complied with? If not, the nature of such contraventions be stated; If an order has been passed by Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any court or any other tribunal, whether the same has been complied with or not?
(vi) Cost records (Section 148 of Companies Act, 2013):
Whether maintenance of cost records has been specified by the Central Government under sub-section (1) of section 148 of the Companies Act, 2013 and whether such accounts and records have been so made and maintained.
(vii) Statutory Dues:
(a) whether the company is regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees’ state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added tax, cess and any other statutory dues to the appropriate authorities and if not, the extent of the arrears of outstanding statutory dues as on the last day of the financial year concerned for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable, shall be indicated; (b) where dues of income tax or sales tax or service tax or duty of customs or duty of excise or value added tax have not been deposited on account of any dispute, then the amounts involved and the forum where dispute is pending shall be mentioned. (A mere representation to the concerned Department shall not be treated as a dispute).
(viii) Default in repayment of loan or borrowings:
Whether the company has defaulted in repayment of loans or borrowing to a financial institution, bank, Government or dues to debenture holders? If yes, the period and the amount of default to be reported (in case of defaults to banks, financial institutions, and Government, lender wise details to be provided).
(ix) Public Offer:
Whether moneys raised by way of initial public offer or further public offer (including debt instruments) and term loans were applied for the purposes for which those are raised. If not, the details together with delays or default and subsequent rectification, if any, as may be applicable, be reported;
(x) Fraud by company or its officers and employees:
Whether any fraud by the company or any fraud on the Company by its officers or employees has been noticed or reported during the year. If yes, the nature and the amount involved is to be indicated;
(xi) Managerial Remuneration (Section 197 of Companies Act, 2013):
Whether managerial remuneration has been paid or provided in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of section 197 read with Schedule V to the Companies Act? If not, state the amount involved and steps taken by the company for securing refund of the same;
(xii) Nidhi Company:
Whether the Nidhi Company has complied with the Net Owned Funds to Deposits in the ratio of 1: 20 to meet out the liability and whether the Nidhi Company is maintaining 10 per cent unencumbered term deposits as specified in the Nidhi Rules, 2014 to meet out the liability;
(xiii) Related Party Transactions:
Whether all transactions with the related parties are in compliance with sections 177 and 188 of Companies Act, 2013 where applicable and the details have been disclosed in the Financial Statements etc., as required by the applicable accounting standards;
(xiv) Preferential allotment or private placement (section 42 of the Companies Act, 2013):
Whether the company has made any preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully or partly convertible debentures during the year under review and if so, as to whether the requirement of section 42 of the Companies Act, 2013 have been complied with and the amount raised have been used for the purposes for which the funds were raised. If not, provide the details in respect of the amount involved and nature of non-compliance;
(xv) Non-cash Transactions:
Whether the company has entered into any non-cash transactions with directors or persons connected with him and if so, whether the provisions of section 192 of Companies Act, 2013 have been complied with;
(xvi) Registration under section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934:
Whether the company is required to be registered under section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 and if so, whether the registration has been obtained.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Comments are closed.