Get News Alerts from Taxmann.com on your desktop.
No Thanks Allow
You have blocked the notification on recent updates. Click below to re-subscribe.
No Thanks
You have already subscribed to Taxmann’s notification.
No Thanks UnSubscribe
Your Session Will Expire in   seconds.
If you do not wish to log-out, choose 'Let me continue'
Reset Session Cancel Session
 
Skip Navigation Links
Dr. Vinok K. Singhania on the Income-tax Act, 1961
  • REOPENING OF CASE

    by PT on Tuesday, December 01, 2015 at 05:14 PM

    SIR, THE CASE OF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER A. Y. 2006-07 ONCE PROCESSED U/S. 143(1), THEN NOTICE FOR 154 RECEIVED AND REPLIED ADDITION MADE TOWARDS CLAIM OF DED. FOR 30 % OF INCENTIVE BONUS AND ADDITIONAL CONVEYANCE, THE SAME WAS APPELAED AND DECIDED IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE ON SOME OTHER TECHNICAL GROUNDS. THE SAME WAS REOPENED ON 22-03-2013 AND THE REASON WAS PROVIDED IN JANUARY 14 AND AFTER HEARING THE ADDITION WAS MADE. LET ME EXPALIN TO WHICH EXTENT THE SAME IS JUSTIFIED WHAT IS THE REMEDY ?

    Replied by

 
taxmann.com
Payment
Best view in 1140 x 768