Corporate Social Responsibility
*Dr. M. Selvakumar
**M. Nagalakshmi
INTRODUCTION
Corporate governance is concerned with the values, vision and visibility. It is about the value orientation of the organization, ethical norms for its performance, the direction of development and social accomplishment of the organization and the visibility of its performance and practices. The concept of corporate governance, which emerged as a response to corporate failures and widespread dissatisfaction with the way many corporate function, has become one of the wide and deep discussions across the globe recently. It primarily hinges on complete transparency, integrity and accountability of the management. There is also an increasingly greater focus on investor protection and public interest.
WHY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE?
The following lines gives the answer to the
question why Corporate Governance?.
a) The liberalization and de-regulation world over gave greater freedom
in management.
This would imply greater
responsibilities.
b) The players in the field are many. Competition brings in its wake
weakness in
standards of reporting and
accountability.
c) Market conditions are increasingly becoming complex in the light of
global
developments like WTO,
removal of barriers/reduction in duties.
*Assistant
Professor, Post Graduate Department of Commerce
**Research
Student, Post Graduate Department of Commerce
d) The failure of corporate due to lack of transparency and disclosures
and instances of falsification of
accounts/embezzlement and the effect of such undesirable practices in other companies.
PREREQUISITES FOR GOOD
GOVERNANCE
There are some pre-requisites for good corporate governance. They are:
• A proper system consisting of clearly defined and adequate structure of roles, authority and responsibility.
• Vision, principles and norms which indicate development path, normative considerations and guidelines and norms for performance.
• A proper system for guiding, monitoring, reporting and control.
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Corporate
Social Responsibility (CSR), also known as corporate responsibility, corporate
citizenship, responsible business, Sustainable Responsible Business (SRB), or
Corporate social performance, is a form of corporate self- regulation
integrated into a business model.
Ideally, CSR policy would function as a built in, self regulating
mechanism whereby business would monitor and ensure its adherence to law,
ethical standards, and international norms.
Business would embrace responsibility for the impact of their activities
on the environment, consumers, employees, communities, stakeholders and all
other members of the public sphere. Essentially, CSR is the deliberate
inclusion of public interest into corporate decision-making, and the honoring
of a triple bottom line: People, Planet, and Profit.
RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY.
Corporations are also citizens of the place where they are created like other citizens, they have social responsibilities. In good corporate governance, the management should be able to meet their social responsibilities, these include making sure that their products are not hazardous to people and to the environment, sharing their profits for the good of the community as a natural person or human being would do, donating to social causes, organizing activities to benefit the community.
Other good corporate governance practices
that overlapped with social responsibility is complying with applicable laws,
setting good labor conditions for employees, providing good products to the
community, helping the economy through fair trade practices, paying taxes and
other obligations due to the government, making commitments to other persons,
natural and juridical alike.
STAKEHOLDERS AND CORPORATE
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Stakeholders are individuals or groups that have
interests, rights, or ownership in an organization and its activities.
Customers, suppliers, employees, and shareholders are example of primary
stakeholder groups. These stakeholder groups form the basis of success and
failure of the business. Each has interest in how an organization performs or
interacts with them. These stakeholder groups can benefit from a company’s
success and can be harmed by its mistakes.
Secondary stakeholders are also important because
they can take action that can damage or assist the organization. Secondary
stakeholders include governments (especially through regulatory agencies),
unions, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), activities, political action
groups, and the media.
In orders to serve their stakeholders in an
ethical and social manner, more and more organizations are adapting the model
of corporate social responsibility. The term Corporate Social Responsibility
goes by many other terms such as corporate citizenship, responsible business or
simply corporate responsibility.

Stakeholders of Organization
When an organization builds ethical and social
elements in its operating philosophy and integrate them in its business
model, it is said to have possessed a self-regulating mechanism that guides, monitor
and ensure its adherence to law, ethics, and norms in carrying out business
activities that ensures the serving the interest of all external and internal
stakeholders. In other words, the objective of being socially responsible
business is achieved when its activities meet or exceed the expectations
of all its stakeholders.
Here is a model for evaluating an organization’s
social performance. The model indicates that total corporate social
responsibility can be subdivided into four criteria-economic, legal, ethical
and discretionary responsibilities.
These responsibilities are ordered from bottom to top in the following
illustration.

Total Corporate Social
Responsibility
Economic responsibilities:
The first criterion of social responsibility is economic
responsibility. The business institution is, above all, the basic
economic unit of society. Its responsibility is to produce goods and services
that a society wants and to maximize profit for its owners and shareholders.
Economic responsibilities, carried to the extreme, are called profit-maximizing
view; it was advocated by Nobel economist Milton Friedman. This view
argued that a company should be operated on a profit-oriented basis, with its
sole mission to increase its profits so long as is stays within the rule of the
game.
The purely profit-maximizing view is no longer
considered an adequate criterion of performance in the world in general.
Treating economic gain in the social as the only social responsibility can lead
companies into trouble.
Legal responsibilities
All modern societies lay down ground rules, laws
and regulations that businesses are expected to follow. Legal
responsibility defines what society deems as important with respect to
appropriate corporate behavior. Businesses are expected to fulfil their
economic goals within the legal framework. Legal requirements are imposed by
local councils, state and federal governments and their regulating agencies.
Organizations that knowingly break the law are poor performers in this
category. Intentionally manufacturing defective goods or billing a client for
work not done is illegal. Legal sanctions may include embarrassing public
apologies or corporate ‘confessions’.
Ethical responsibilities
Ethical responsibilities
include
behavior that is not necessarily codified into law and may not serve the
organization’s direct economic interests. To be ethical, organization’s
decision makers should act with equity, fairness and impartiality, respect the
rights of individuals, and provide different treatments of individual only when
differences between them are relevant to the organization’s goals and tasks. Unethical
behavior occurs when decisions enable an individual or organization to gain
expense of society.
Discretionary responsibilities
Discretionary responsibility is purely voluntary and
guided by an organization’s desire to make social contributions not mandated by
economics, laws or ethics. Discretionary activities include generous
philanthropic contributions that offer no payback to the organization and are
not expected. Discretionary responsibility is the highest criterion of social
responsibility, because it goes beyond societal expectations to contribute to
the community’s welfare.
Stakeholders governance models offer
political and economic benefits. Still
stakeholder collaboration remains fairky underdeveloped and often
ineffective. Limited stakeholder
inculsion, strategic management of stakeholders and co-optation of stakeholder
involvement by managerial groups creates limits. But a bigger but more hidden problem has been the lack of serious
attention to models of communication in collaborative decision making. Innovative communcation processes based in
conflict rather than consensus models can positively imact Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR).
CONCLUSION
"Success
is not the art of making mistakes when nobody is looking at, true success is
the truthful expression of the performance when it is measured"
Corporate governance has assumed vital role and significance due to globalization and liberalization. The excellence in terms of customer satisfaction, in terms of return, in terms of product and service, in terms of return to promoters and in terms of social responsibilities towards society and people cannot be achieved without practicing good corporate governance.
"Corporate
Governance practices and concept has been recently raised due to growing level
if falls out in corporate sector leading to severe injury not only to the Stake
holders but to the whole economy”.